Abstract
We report the results of a series of density functional theory (DFT) calculations aimed at predicting the (57)Fe Mössbauer electric field gradient (EFG) tensors (quadrupole splittings and asymmetry parameters) and their orientations in S = 0, (1)/(2), 1, (3)/(2), 2, and (5)/(2) metalloproteins and/or model systems. Excellent results were found by using a Wachter's all electron basis set for iron, 6-311G for other heavy atoms, and 6-31G for hydrogen atoms, BPW91 and B3LYP exchange-correlation functionals, and spin-unrestricted methods for the paramagnetic systems. For the theory versus experiment correlation, we found R(2) = 0.975, slope = 0.99, intercept = -0.08 mm sec(-)(1), rmsd = 0.30 mm sec(-)(1) (N = 23 points) covering a DeltaE(Q) range of 5.63 mm s(-)(1) when using the BPW91 functional and R(2) = 0.978, slope = 1.12, intercept = -0.26 mm sec(-)(1), rmsd = 0.31 mm sec(-)(1) when using the B3LYP functional. DeltaE(Q) values in the following systems were successfully predicted: (1) ferric low-spin (S = (1)/(2)) systems, including one iron porphyrin with the usual (d(xy))(2)(d(xz)d(yz))(3) electronic configuration and two iron porphyrins with the more unusual (d(xz)d(yz))(4)(d(xy))(1) electronic configuration; (2) ferrous NO-heme model compounds (S = (1)/(2)); (3) ferrous intermediate spin (S = 1) tetraphenylporphinato iron(II); (4) a ferric intermediate spin (S = (3)/(2)) iron porphyrin; (5) ferrous high-spin (S = 2) deoxymyoglobin and deoxyhemoglobin; and (6) ferric high spin (S = (5)/(2)) metmyoglobin plus two five-coordinate and one six-coordinate iron porphyrins. In addition, seven diamagnetic (S = 0, d(6) and d(8)) systems studied previously were reinvestigated using the same functionals and basis set scheme as used for the paramagnetic systems. All computed asymmetry parameters were found to be in good agreement with the available experimental data as were the electric field gradient tensor orientations. In addition, we investigated the electronic structures of several systems, including the (d(xy))(2)(d(xz),d(yz))(3) and (d(xz),d(yz))(4)(d(xy))(1) [Fe(III)/porphyrinate](+) cations as well as the NO adduct of Fe(II)(octaethylporphinate), where interesting information on the spin density distributions can be readily obtained from the computed wave functions.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.