Abstract

In health technology assessments, life expectancy estimates are often used for evaluating the effectiveness of interventions. Due to limited follow-up data, parametric models are typically used to fit patient-level data but yield inaccurate extrapolation until lifetime. We aim to compare two relatively new approaches, the flexible parametric relative survival model (FPM) by Andersson et al. (2013) and the rolling extrapolation algorithm (REA) by Hwang et al. (2017), which incorporate relative survival framework into their extrapolation processes with the intention to provide more robust extrapolated survival for estimating life expectancy.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.