Abstract

Double inversion recovery (DIR) MRI is a relatively novel imaging technique in which both white matter (WM) and CSF signals are suppressed; cortical lesions are thereby identified as focal areas of hyperintensity relative to surrounding gray matter (GM).1 Three dimensional DIR increases intracortical lesion detection by 500% compared to lesion identification on T2-weighted spin-echo, and by more than 150% when compared to 3D fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR).1 Despite these improvements, DIR-detected lesions are fewer than expected based on postmortem studies2: less than 7 (on average) per patient in relapsing-remitting (RR), primary progressive (PP), and secondary progressive (SP) multiple sclerosis (MS).3,–,5 This low rate of detection could be due to technical factors, such as low signal-to-noise ratio, poor definition of lesion boundaries, and the high likelihood of artifacts (e.g., flow, signal intensity differences between slabs, and vessel hyperintensities). It is not easy to see cortical lesions on DIR images, and even when following the conservative international recommendations on lesion scoring (subpial lesions are excluded), experts reached complete agreement in only 19% of the lesions scored.6 Why have these challenges and limitations not discouraged the use of DIR in clinical studies? The short answer is that there is a …

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.