Abstract

Simple SummarySedation has been shown to reduce stress and damage during live fish transportation. However, there is a lack of information regarding MS-222 alternatives. The present study aimed at assessing the effects of propofol during a 6-h simulated transportation of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) focusing on physiology, histology, behavior, and meat integrity. Fluctuations in water chemistry, glucose, hematological parameters, and behavioral response were found in propofol-treated animals (although it was normalized after the recovery period). In general, the findings highlight the potential use of propofol as a beneficial mediator of transportation-induced stress in fish contributing to improve fish welfare.The use of anesthetics has been suggested as a strategy to hamper live fish transport-induced stress. Still, there is insufficient data available on the use of alternative anesthetics to MS-222. This study investigated the use of propofol to mitigate stress in Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus, 143.8 ± 20.9 g and 20.4 ± 0.9 cm) during a 6 h simulated transport. Individuals (n = 7) were divided into three groups: control, 40 mg L−1 MS-222, and 0.8 mg L−1 propofol. A naïve group non-transported was also considered. During the 6 h transport and 24 h after, the response to external stimuli, opercular movements, water quality parameters, behavior, blood hematology and other physiological values, the histopathology of the gills, the quality of the fillet, and oxidative-stress changes in gills, muscle, brain, and liver were evaluated. Propofol increased swimming activity of fish but decreased opercular movements and responses to external stimuli, indicating oscillations of the sedation depth. Water pH and glucose levels increased, while hematocrit (HCT) and lactate decreased in propofol groups at 6 h. At this time-point, MS-222 also induced a decrease in the HCT and lactate levels while increasing cortisol levels. Despite these effects, the stress-related behaviors lessened with anesthetics compared to the control group. After the recovery period, physiological responses normalized in animals from both anesthetic groups, but the control still had high cortisol levels. Overall, propofol is a good alternative for the transportation of this species, showing efficient sedation without compromising health or fillet quality. However, further pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics knowledge is required to support its use in aquaculture settings.

Highlights

  • In recent years, there has been a growing concern related to fish welfare in research and aquaculture [1]

  • The repeated measures (RM) analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed that there was an effect of time (F(2.56,15.36) = 39.54, p < 0.0001), groups (F(2.32,13.91) = 24.12, p < 0.0001) and there is an interaction between the two factors (F(3.80,21.23) = 8.775, p < 0.0001), simple effects of factors were analyzed

  • A 34% increased rate was observed in the control fish comp trhesepinraatïovrey gfrreoquepnc(yp i=n r0e.l0a0ti8o)n. tAoltshoe, nthaïevepgrroopuopfo(pl-

Read more

Summary

Introduction

There has been a growing concern related to fish welfare in research and aquaculture [1]. The stress response is characterized by the stimulation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-interrenal axis with the release of corticosteroids and catecholamines [8,9,10,11] This induces the activation of a cascade of events that may culminate in deleterious effects on fish health, increasing disease susceptibility and mortality [8,12] and thereby reducing the profitability and welfare of fish. In this view, it is essential to refine the appropriate transport protocol, inducing the least stress possible

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call