Abstract

Our objective was to analyse the usefulness of single-slice MR-myelography images as a complementary test to conventional MR of the spine in patients with clinically suspected degenerative spine disease. A prospective analysis of 1022 consecutive patients studied with conventional MR and MR-myelography (four acquisitions: one coronal plane, one sagittal plane, and two oblique lateral, right and left planes) examinations was performed. Conventional MR and MR-myelography studies were classified as positive when morphological or structural alterations were noted. Positive MR-myelography information was also categorized as relevant if findings were considered important and radiologically significative to the final diagnosis (either by increasing the radiologists confidence in the diagnosis or because the findings were not observed in the conventional study). Other positive findings were considered non- relevant. There were 62% cases considered positive in the MR-myelography examination. Of them, 3% revealed no alterations on the conventional MR examination. Of the negative MR-myelography studies, 75% had a positive conventional MR examination. Considered as diagnostic techniques, their Kappa concordance was poor. However, MR-myelography complemented the information obtained with the conventional MR examination of the spine, this information being relevant to the final MR diagnosis in 22% of the total number of cases. The contribution of MR-myelography was not different in the three spinal levels. In conclusion, MR-myelography complements the information obtained with conventional MR in a large number of cases.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.