Abstract

PurposeMRI is the imaging modality of choice for soft tissue-related spine disease. However, CT is superior to MRI in providing clear visualization of bony morphology. The purpose of this study is to test equivalency of MRI-based synthetic CT to conventional CT in quantitatively assessing bony morphology of the lumbar spine. MethodA prospective study with an equivalency design was performed. Adult patients who had undergone MRI and CT of the lumbar spine were included. Synthetic CT images were generated from MRI using a deep learning-based image synthesis method. Two readers independently measured pedicle width, spinal canal width, neuroforamen length, anterior and posterior vertebral body height, superior and inferior vertebral body length, superior and inferior vertebral body width, maximal disc height, lumbar curvature and spinous process length on synthetic CT and CT. The agreement among CT and synthetic CT was evaluated using equivalency statistical testing. ResultsThirty participants were included (14 men and 16 women, range 20–60 years). The measurements performed on synthetic CT of pedicle width, spinal canal width, vertebral body height, vertebral body width, vertebral body length and spinous process length were statistically equivalent to CT measurements at the considered margins. Excellent inter- and intra-reader reliability was found for both synthetic CT and CT. ConclusionsEquivalency of MRI-based synthetic CT to CT was demonstrated on geometrical measurements in the lumbar spine. In combination with the soft tissue information of the conventional MRI, this provides new possibilities in diagnosis and surgical planning without ionizing radiation.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.