Abstract

Purpose: To determine the frequency of the MRI signs of meniscal bucket - handle tears already known as the double PCL sign, the flipped meniscus sign, the absent bow-tie sign, and the fragment-in-notch sign, and to compare the sagittal with the coronal images. Materials and Methods : We retrospectively reviewed the MR findings of 37 patients in whom an initial interpretation of MR images had suggested meniscal bucket - handle tears. All underwent subsequent arthroscopic evaluation and in 28, bucket - handle tears were confirmed. Sagittal double-echo and coronal fat-suppressed double-echo T 2 - weighted images were obtained. Sagittal images were evaluated to determine whether or not signs of bucket-handle tear were evident, and coronal images were checked for a torn meniscus with displaced fragment. We also evaluated the MR find-ings of the nine false positive cases. Results : The prevalence rate of absent bow - tie, double PCL, fragment-in-notch, and flipped meniscus signs was 96.4%, 53.6%, 17.9%, and 10.7%, respectively. The detection rate for displaced fragment was higher with coronal images (92.9%) than with sagittal images (78.6%). Among the nine false positive cases, a longitudinal tear in the discoid meniscus was most common. A false-positive diagnosis was much more frequent on sagittal than on coronal images. Conclusion: The prevalence rate of absent bow-tie sign was very high, but was accompanied by a relatively high rate of misinterpretation. Coronal fat-suppressed T2- weighted images provided more reliable clues for the diagnosis of bucket-handle tears, with a high detection rate of displaced fragment.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.