Abstract

ObjectivesTo investigate the optimal timing for post-chemoradiotherapy (CRT) reference magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in head and neck cancer, so as to demonstrate a maximal treatment response. To assess whether this differs in human papillomavirus–related oropharyngeal cancer (HPV-OPC) and whether the MRI timing impacts on the ability to predict treatment success.MethodsFollowing ethical approval and informed consent, 45 patients (40 male, mean age 59.7 ± 7.9 years, 33 HPV-OPC) with stage 3 and 4 HNSCC underwent pre-treatment, 6- and 12-week post-CRT MRIs in this prospective cohort study. Primary tumour (n = 39) size, T2w morphology and diffusion weight imaging (DWI) scores, together with nodal (n = 42) size and necrotic/cystic change, were recorded. Interval imaging changes were analysed for all patients and according to HPV-OPC status. MRI descriptors and their interval changes were also compared with 2-year progression-free survival (PFS).ResultsAll MRI descriptors significantly changed between pre-treatment and 6-week post-treatment MRI studies (p < .001). Primary tumour and nodal volume decreased between 6- and 12-week studies; however, interval changes in linear dimensions were only evident for HPV-OPC lymph nodes. Nodal necrosis scores also evolved after 6 weeks but other descriptors were stable. The 6-week nodal necrosis score and the 6- and 12-week nodal volume were predictive of 2-year PFS.ConclusionApart from HPV-OPC patients with nodal disease, the 6-week post-CRT MRI demonstrates maximal reduction in the linear dimensions of head and neck cancer; however, a later reference study should be considered if volumetric analysis is applied.Key Points• This study provides guidance on when early post-treatment imaging should be performed in head and neck cancer following chemoradiotherapy, in order to aid subsequent detection of recurrent tumour.• Lymph nodes in HPV-related oropharyngeal cancer patients clearly reduced in size from 6 to 12 weeks post-treatment. However, other lymph node disease and all primary tumours showed only a minor reduction in size beyond 6 weeks, and this required a detailed volumetric analysis for demonstration.• Timing of the reference MRI following chemoradiotherapy for head and neck cancer depends on whether the patient has HPV-related oropharyngeal cancer and whether there is nodal disease. MRI as early as 6 weeks post-treatment may be performed unless volumetric analysis is routinely performed.

Highlights

  • MethodsChemoradiotherapy (CRT) is the principal treatment option for stage 3 and 4 head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC)

  • This study provides guidance on when early post-treatment imaging should be performed in head and neck cancer following chemoradiotherapy, in order to aid subsequent detection of recurrent tumour

  • The detection of residual or recurrent HNSCC by clinical examination maybe challenging due to posttreatment changes, whilst biopsies may be unreliable and add to morbidity [3,4,5,6]. 18F-Fluorodeoxygluocose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) [7], quantitative diffusion-weighted (DW) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) [8,9,10,11,12] and qualitative MRI descriptors have all been used to aid tumour detection in the post-treatment setting

Read more

Summary

Introduction

MethodsChemoradiotherapy (CRT) is the principal treatment option for stage 3 and 4 head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). MRI descriptors such as T2w and DWI signal, morphology and dimensions have been demonstrated to contribute to both the early post-treatment and later symptomatic assessment of recurrent disease [13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23]. It would be useful to ascertain the earliest point at which the successfully treated tumour demonstrates the greatest response on imaging. This would allow for earlier post-treatment reference imaging and potentially earlier detection of recurrent tumour during imaging surveillance. The impact of human papillomavirus oropharyngeal cancer (HPV-OPC) status on the timing of post-treatment change should be explored since it is a potential confounding factor, with its differing morphological features and improved clinical outcomes [24, 25]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call