Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate different renal proton density fat fraction (PDFF) analysis approaches. Additionally, we assessed renal fat in obese individuals and lean individuals. This was a retrospective observational case-control study. Twenty-eight obese individuals and 14 lean controls underwent MRI with multi-point Dixon technique for PDFF maps. The following renal PDFF image analysis approaches were performed and compared: (1) five circular regions of interest (ROIs) in six slices, (2) three circular ROIs in one slice, (3) freehand segmentation of renal parenchyma in one slice, and (4) freehand segmentation of renal parenchyma avoiding the renal border in one slice. Furthermore, renal PDFF was compared between obese and lean individuals. Methods 1, 2, and 4 were positively correlated (r ≥ 0.498, p ≤ 0.001). Renal PDFF values varied more with regards to ROI placement within slices than mean PDFF between slices. Using all methods, the obese individuals had significantly higher renal PDFF values compared with the lean controls. Renal PDFF should be measured covering large areas of the kidney while excluding artifacts. This can be achieved using multiple circular ROIs. Increased lipid accumulation in the kidneys was related to obesity.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call