Abstract

IntroductionSeveral previous studies examined different brainstem-derived MR planimetric measures with regards to their diagnostic accuracy in separating patients with neurodegenerative parkinsonian disorders and reported conflicting results. The current study aimed to compare their performance in a well-characterized sample of patients with neurodegenerative parkinsonian disorders. MethodsMR planimetric measurements were assessed in a large retrospective cohort of 55 progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP), 194 Parkinson's disease (PD) and 63 multiple system atrophy (MSA) patients. This cohort served as a training set used to build C4.5 decision tree models to discriminate PSP, PD and MSA. The models were validated in two independent test sets. The first test set comprised 84 patients with early, clinically unclassifiable parkinsonism (CUP). A prospective cohort of patients with PSP (n = 23), PD (n = 40) and MSA (n = 22) was exploited as a second test-set. ResultsThe pons-to-midbrain diameter ratio, the midbrain diameter, the middle cerebellar peduncle width and the pons area were identified as the most predictive parameters to separate PSP, MSA and PD in C4.5 decision tree models derived from the training set. Using these decision models, AUCs in discriminating PSP, MSA and PD were 0.90, 0.57 and 0.73 in the CUP-cohort and 0.95, 0.61 and 0.87 in the prospective cohort, respectively. ConclusionWe were able to demonstrate that brainstem-derived MR planimetric measures yield high diagnostic accuracy for the discrimination of PSP from related disorders when decision tree algorithms are applied, even at early, clinically uncertain stages. However, their diagnostic accuracy in discriminating PD and MSA was suboptimal.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.