Year-end Sale % OFF 
Abstract
To compare magnetic resonance (MR) angiography and fast MR imaging with spin-echo (SE) and non-MR imaging techniques in examination of the thoracic aorta. Eighty-nine patients underwent breath-hold or cine MR angiography; SE was used in 67 patients and fast MR imaging in 28. A comparison was made with non-MR imaging (transthoracic echocardiography in 49 patients, transesophageal echocardiography in 18, and arteriography in 33) findings and those from surgery or autopsy (16 patients). MR angiography enabled differentiation of slow flow from thrombus, demonstrated aortic valve anatomy and aortic regurgitation, and accurately showed anatomy with only one error. It demonstrated two communications, flaps, and three branch stenoses better than SE, which produced some artifacts that mimicked thrombus or flaps. Fast MR imaging often produced artifacts or poor image quality (10 of 28 patients). Compared with SE MR imaging, MR angiography provides additional useful anatomic and functional information concerning diseases of the thoracic aorta, usually gained only with echocardiography or arteriography.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
