Abstract

We compared quantitatively and qualitatively a single shot fast spin-echo (SS-FSE) technique with a T2-weighted fast spin-echo (T2-FSE) technique and to determine whether SS-FSE is a valuable alternative to fast SE (FSE) imaging. A total of 41 consecutive patients with brain lesions were retrospectively evaluated. Together with quantitative analysis, contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR), signal-to-noise ratios (SNR), and the percent contrast (%C) were measured for the lesion. Images were evaluated by two radiologists who reached consensus. Visibility (detection), margination, and extent of the lesions were rated separately, according to a five-point scale. The mean lesion CNR was significantly higher on SS-FSE sequences than on fast SE sequences (p=0.0131). The mean lesion %C was also higher on SS-FSE than on T2-FSE sequence (p=0.0222). However, the mean lesion SNR was significantly higher on T2-FSE sequence than on SSFSE sequence (p?0.0222). No significant differences were found in the visibility (detectability) of the lesions between two pulse sequences (p=0.1323). The SS-FSE technique is quantitatively superior to T2-FSE for obtaining T2-weighted images of the brain. In comparison with T2-FSE, SS-FSE provides comparable T2-weighted images with sufficient contrast in the evaluation of brain lesions. Our findings suggest that SSFSE may be useful for ill, uncooperative patients, especially for the children patients requiring sedation.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call