Abstract

Although fast spin-echo images and slower spin-echo images have similar contrast characteristics, the two techniques have not yet been shown to be equivalent in all aspects of brain imaging. To determine if the two sequences are equivalent, we compared detection of white matter lesions, image quality, and artifact degradation on fast spin-echo and spin-echo proton density-weighted and T2-weighted MR images of the brain in prospectively selected patients who were seropositive for HIV. Fast spin-echo and spin-echo MR images of the brain were obtained in 153 consecutive subjects. The images were reviewed independently by three experienced neuroradiologists. The size, number, and location of white matter lesions were compared for the two techniques. Image quality, motion artifact, CSF flow artifact, and gray-white matter differentiation were graded on a five-point scale. No statistical difference was found in gray-white matter differentiation. Overall image quality, CSF flow artifacts, and motion artifacts were slightly worse on the fast spin-echo images (p < .05). Although some variability existed in the detection of lesions less than 5 mm in diameter, the differences was small, and all larger lesions were detected by both techniques. Agreement between fast spin-echo and conventional spin-echo techniques was nearly exact with respect to characterizing findings in brain as either normal or abnormal. Fast spin-echo and spin-echo MR of the brain produce images of similar quality and show white matter lesions equally well. These results support the replacement of slower, conventional spin-echo pulse sequences with faster fast spin-echo sequences.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.