Abstract

Previous studies have shown that people understand the future ancillary cost of durable goods such as an automotive vehicle. However, consumers tend to misunderstand the future benefits and costs of these goods. One of the most interesting discussions about consumer cognitive ability for future energy cost is the miles per gallon (MPG) illusion. In this study, we analyze people’s misunderstanding of the relationship between kilometers per liter (KPL) and the actual amount of fuel saved using vehicle owner survey data. We developed some questions to measure how much each person is involved with the MPG (or KPL) illusion. Additionally, our survey includes questions capturing some preferences affecting future fuel costs, such as time. Controlling for the most important respondent characteristics, such as income or gender, our empirical model analyzes the extent of the misunderstanding of how much actual KPL selections of personal auto vehicles are affected. We found that many Japanese consumers tend to misunderstand the relationship between KPL and actual fuel costs. Our results demonstrate that people who misunderstand the relationship tend to choose a higher 4.324 km per liter car than those who understand. This finding implies that the KPL illusion affects the KPL selection of consumers’ cars.

Highlights

  • Previous studies have shown that people understand the future ancillary cost of durable goods [1,2]

  • This study examined how the miles per gallon (MPG) (KPL) illusion affected the actual MPG (KPL) of

  • This study examined how the MPG (KPL) illusion affected the actual MPG (KPL) of a a car

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Previous studies have shown that people understand the future ancillary cost of durable goods [1,2]. Consumers tend to misunderstand the future benefits and costs of goods [3]. Even when consumers can gain future benefits by purchasing new energy-efficient durable goods, they tend to avoid upgrading to such goods. This phenomenon is known as the “energy paradox” for several years [4]. The cost is generally more than that of nonfuel-efficient cars. Whether they buy the car depends on the magnitude relation between the fuel cost reduction estimated for the future and their price

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.