Abstract
You have accessJournal of UrologyInfertility: Therapy I1 Apr 2017MP89-15 PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS OF CHILDLESS MEN UNDERGOING VASECTOMY REVERSAL: RESULTS OF RETROSPECTIVE REVIEW Christopher Corder, Amy Perkins, Matthew Marks, Sheldon Marks, and Christopher Deibert Christopher CorderChristopher Corder More articles by this author , Amy PerkinsAmy Perkins More articles by this author , Matthew MarksMatthew Marks More articles by this author , Sheldon MarksSheldon Marks More articles by this author , and Christopher DeibertChristopher Deibert More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2017.02.2813AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES Vasectomy is a commonly used method of permanent sterilization in the US. The overwhelming majority of these men have fathered at least one child. However, a small subset of men undergoing elective sterilization have never fathered a child. We sought to describe the clinical and social aspects of the childless male seeking vasectomy reversal and analyze any potential differences from their counterparts. METHODS Retrospective chart review was performed for patients presenting for vasectomy reversal from 2011-2015. 1,242 men were identified for analysis. Patient and partner demographics, parity status and reversal type were compared between prior fathers and childless men. RESULTS Our database included 1,242 men from 2011 to 2015 whom had previously had a vasectomy and were seeking reversal. Of those, 9% (n=116) had never previously fathered children, and 91% (n=1,126) had at least one prior child. These men were largely similar on comparison of age (41.4 vs 39.8 years), partner age (32.8 years), and known female factor (2.5%). However, childless men were significantly more likely to have a nulliparous female partner; 79% vs 59% (p=<0.001). They were also found to have a slightly longer obstructive interval (8.95 vs 10.02 years, p=0.076), although this point did not reach statistical significance. Comparing type of reversal in childless vs those with children, bilateral VV performed in 74% vs 66%, bilateral VE performed in 10% vs 12% and combination VV/VE in 13% vs 16%; these differences were not significant. Patency was 98% (n=102) for childless men and 94% (n=949) for men with prior children. CONCLUSIONS This retrospective review sheds light on a unique population of men for which there is a paucity of data in the literature. To our knowledge this is the first study examining childless men electing vasectomy reversal. This data offers important information that may be included in preoperative counseling targeted specifically to men whom have not fathered children. © 2017FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 197Issue 4SApril 2017Page: e1207-e1208 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2017MetricsAuthor Information Christopher Corder More articles by this author Amy Perkins More articles by this author Matthew Marks More articles by this author Sheldon Marks More articles by this author Christopher Deibert More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.