Abstract

You have accessJournal of UrologyGeneral & Epidemiological Trends & Socioeconomics: Value of Care: Cost & Outcomes Measures II1 Apr 2018MP86-20 PRIMARY TESTICULAR LYMPHOMA: ONCOLOGIC OUTCOMES AND TREATMENT PATTERNS Fernando Caumont, John Burns, Mazen Alsinnawi, John Paul Flores, Sydney Akapame, and Christopher Porter Fernando CaumontFernando Caumont More articles by this author , John BurnsJohn Burns More articles by this author , Mazen AlsinnawiMazen Alsinnawi More articles by this author , John Paul FloresJohn Paul Flores More articles by this author , Sydney AkapameSydney Akapame More articles by this author , and Christopher PorterChristopher Porter More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2018.02.2900AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES Primary Testicular Lymphoma (PTL) is the most common testicular cancer in older men. Little documentation of this important disease is available in the urologic literature. Since PTL is not represented in germ cell (GCT) databases, epidemiology can only be ascertained by examination of lymphoma databases. As the US population ages, this disease presents more commonly to urologists. We evaluate the epidemiology of PTL and compare the oncological outcomes and treatment patterns of PTL and GCT. METHODS We examined 2 large databases from the National Cancer Database (NCDB) 2004-13. Using NCDB′s Lymphoma DB diagnosis of extra nodal lymphoma (N=133,172) we compared the frequency of PTL (N=2250) to GCT from the germ cell DB (N=45078). Demographic information (DI), treatment options (TO), and histopathological features were obtained. Kaplan-Meier (KM) survival plots were used to examine OS at 5 & 8 yrs post diagnosis. Classical Cox proportional hazards models assessed the effect of DI and TO on OS in PTL. RESULTS 2,096 PTL patients post orchiectomy were analyzed. PTL represents the most frequent testicular malignancy in men >65 (Fig 1). The Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) 0, 1 and 2+ was 79%, 17% and 4% for PTL and 94%, 5% and 1 % for GCT. Analysis of the TO of our PTL cohort showed that 825 (39%) men underwent chemotherapy (ChT); 68 (4%) radiotherapy (RT); 732 (35%) RT + ChT; 471 (22%) no further treatment after orchiectomy. Cox regression showed increased CCI scores were significantly associated with mortality risk in PTL at 5 years (CCI 1 with HR 1.29 [1.04-1.61; p = 0.017], CCI ≥2 with HR 2.17 [1.51-3.11; p = 0.001]) and 8 years (CCI 1 with HR 1.31 [1.07-1.62; p = 0.007], CCI ≥2 with HR 2.08 [1.44-3; p = 0.001]). KM survival analysis showed that 5 & 8 year OS was 65% and 61% respectively for PTL vs. 96% at 5 & 8 years for GCT. CONCLUSIONS NCDB data includes >70% of newly diagnosed US malignancies, allowing us to analyze the largest cohort for PTL to date. PTL becomes more prevalent >65 yrs. Higher CCI adversely impacted OS. Further, we have shown that only 1 in 3 PTL patients received appropriate treatment with ChT+RT following orchiectomy, a significant underutilization of National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines (Version 2.2015), underlining the importance of following NCCN guidelines in PTL. © 2018FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 199Issue 4SApril 2018Page: e1186 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2018MetricsAuthor Information Fernando Caumont More articles by this author John Burns More articles by this author Mazen Alsinnawi More articles by this author John Paul Flores More articles by this author Sydney Akapame More articles by this author Christopher Porter More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.