Abstract

You have accessJournal of UrologyCME1 Apr 2023MP75-17 MATERNAL, NEONATAL AND PREGNANCY OUTCOMES IN UROLOGY: HOW DO WE MEASURE UP? Brittany Levy, Tess London-Bounds, Alexandra Kejner, Nikita Gupta, Adam Dugan, Will Cranford, and Amanda Saltzman Brittany LevyBrittany Levy More articles by this author , Tess London-BoundsTess London-Bounds More articles by this author , Alexandra KejnerAlexandra Kejner More articles by this author , Nikita GuptaNikita Gupta More articles by this author , Adam DuganAdam Dugan More articles by this author , Will CranfordWill Cranford More articles by this author , and Amanda SaltzmanAmanda Saltzman More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000003349.17AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Physicians and especially surgeons, are higher risk for pregnancy complications leading to poor pregnancy, neonatal and health outcomes. However, across surgical specialties, pregnancy and neonatal outcomes have not been delineated. The objective of this survey study was to evaluate maternal, neonatal and pregnancy outcomes compared to other surgical specialties. METHODS: A survey was distributed to practicing surgeons across specialties including general surgery, urology, otolaryngology, and associated subspecialties. Survey questions regarding demographics, career stage, pregnancy/delivery, neonatal complications, maternity leave, breast feeding goals, and barriers to meeting these goals were asked. Responses were analyzed comparing urology/urologic subspecialties to other surgical specialties. RESULTS: S:1162 births across surgical specialties were obtained, 159 of which were to urologic surgeons. Of these births, 454 were to trainees, while 694 children were birthed to attendings. Similarities across surgical subspecialties included gestational age at delivery (p=0.161). Those in urology/urology subspecialties were less likely to have pregnancy complications compared to other surgical specialties (31.4% vs 44.4%, p=0.003). Additionally, children born to urologists were more frequently healthy (87.8% vs 78.1%, p=0.031) without major or minor neonatal health issues (Figure 1). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, urologists have improved pregnancy and infant health outcomes compared to other surgical specialties. Further research is needed to identify specific etiologies to enable directed quality improvement measures for all child bearing surgeons. Source of Funding: None © 2023 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 209Issue Supplement 4April 2023Page: e1087 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2023 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Brittany Levy More articles by this author Tess London-Bounds More articles by this author Alexandra Kejner More articles by this author Nikita Gupta More articles by this author Adam Dugan More articles by this author Will Cranford More articles by this author Amanda Saltzman More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.