Abstract

You have accessJournal of UrologyCME1 Apr 2023MP75-16 LONGER SURGICAL WAIT TIMES AFTER VISIT TO UROLOGY CLINIC IS ASSOCIATED WITH DECREASED ODDS OF COMPLEX STONE SURGERY Sudarshan Srirangapatanam, Cameron Hicks, Thomas Chi, Marshall Stoller, and David Bayne Sudarshan SrirangapatanamSudarshan Srirangapatanam More articles by this author , Cameron HicksCameron Hicks More articles by this author , Thomas ChiThomas Chi More articles by this author , Marshall StollerMarshall Stoller More articles by this author , and David BayneDavid Bayne More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000003349.16AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Kidney stones are known to grow over time and delays between emergency department visits and surgical care are associated with more complex surgical intervention. As such, the objective of this study is to investigate the effect of the wait times from urology clinic visits to surgery on the eventual complexity of kidney stone surgery. METHODS: Urologic visits were identified using The AUA Quality (AQUA) Registry. Subsequently, adults (age ≥18) having a diagnosis of nephrolithiasis and undergoing ≥1 urologic stone procedure were identified. These patients were then followed for at least 365 days after their index surgery to determine the total burden of procedures. Any patients without 365 days of follow-up were excluded. Our outcomes were defined as percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) vs. non-PNL index surgery, undergoing more than 1 urologic procedure within 365 days, and receipt of complex surgery (PNL as index surgery or >1 procedure within 365 days). Each outcome was analyzed using a multivariate logistic model with wait times as predictor controlling for age, gender, race, insurance, social deprivation index, obesity, diabetes, and flomax prescription. RESULTS: A total of 137,477 patients underwent ≥1 urologic stone procedure. Of these, 6,497 (4.7%) patients underwent index PNL and 40,968 (29.8%) patients underwent more than 1 procedure within 365 days. Stratifying patients by index procedure type revealed highers odds of undergoing PNL for any wait time (ref: 0-3 months) but little change was observed as wait times increased (slope=0.0005, p=0.29). Odds of undergoing multiple procedures (slope=-0.0035) and receipt of complex stone surgery (slope=-0.0031) both showed a decreased trend as wait times increased (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Increased surgical wait times is generally expected to lead to worse outcomes due to disease progression in the patients. Paradoxically, we show that an increasing time interval from urologic clinic visits to surgical treatment associates with lower odds of complex surgery. Therefore, time from diagnosis to evaluation by a urologist may be the rate-limiting step in the time course of kidney stone treatment. And reducing this time may reduce previously recognized disparities in the eventual need for complex kidney stone surgery. Source of Funding: K12DK111028 © 2023 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 209Issue Supplement 4April 2023Page: e1086 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2023 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Sudarshan Srirangapatanam More articles by this author Cameron Hicks More articles by this author Thomas Chi More articles by this author Marshall Stoller More articles by this author David Bayne More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.