Abstract

You have accessJournal of UrologyCME1 Apr 2023MP73-17 WHOLE GLAND ABLATION USING HIGH-INTENSITY FOCUSED ULTRASOUND VERSUS ROBOT-ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY: A PROPENSITY SCORE-MATCHED STUDY Jin Noh, Gyoohwan Jung, Hae Sung Lee, Jun Hyun Nam, Jung Kwon Kim, Sangchul Lee, Seong Jin Jeong, Jong Jin Oh, Seok-Soo Byun, Sung Kyu Hong, and Hakmin Lee Jin NohJin Noh More articles by this author , Gyoohwan JungGyoohwan Jung More articles by this author , Hae Sung LeeHae Sung Lee More articles by this author , Jun Hyun NamJun Hyun Nam More articles by this author , Jung Kwon KimJung Kwon Kim More articles by this author , Sangchul LeeSangchul Lee More articles by this author , Seong Jin JeongSeong Jin Jeong More articles by this author , Jong Jin OhJong Jin Oh More articles by this author , Seok-Soo ByunSeok-Soo Byun More articles by this author , Sung Kyu HongSung Kyu Hong More articles by this author , and Hakmin LeeHakmin Lee More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000003341.17AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: We compared the clinical outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) and whole gland ablation (WGA) using high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) in localized prostate cancer. METHODS: We analyzed 3,806 patients who had undergone RARP and WGA using HIFU. According to the propensity score for each treatment, 84 patients after WGA were matched to 3,722 patients after RARP at a 1:4 ratio using the nearest neighbor method. RESULTS: The matched cohort comprised 420 subjects (RARP, 336; PGA, 84), with a median follow-up period of 26 months. Treatment failures were identified in 16.7% and 15.5% of patients in the WGA and RARP groups, respectively. Kaplan-Meier analyses revealed no significantly failure-free (p=0.999) and salvage-free survival (p=0.548) in the RARP group than in the WGA group. There was no significant difference in the postoperative urinary symptom score (p=0.630), but the postoperative erectile function score in group of preoperative international index of erectile function (IIEF)≥17 was significantly higher in the WGA group (p=0.030). The rate of urinary incontinence (any pad) was lower in the WGA group than that in the RARP group (10.7% vs 20.2%, p=0.057). Postoperative complications were more frequent in the WGA group (p<0.001); however, there was no significant difference in high-grade complications (≥3) (p=0.201). CONCLUSIONS: WGA using HIFU showed statistically similar oncological outcomes compared with RARP for failure-free survival and salvage-free survival. However, functional outcomes regarding erectile function in selective group and postoperative incontinence were more favorable in the WGA group. Source of Funding: N/A © 2023 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 209Issue Supplement 4April 2023Page: e1042 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2023 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Jin Noh More articles by this author Gyoohwan Jung More articles by this author Hae Sung Lee More articles by this author Jun Hyun Nam More articles by this author Jung Kwon Kim More articles by this author Sangchul Lee More articles by this author Seong Jin Jeong More articles by this author Jong Jin Oh More articles by this author Seok-Soo Byun More articles by this author Sung Kyu Hong More articles by this author Hakmin Lee More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call