Abstract
You have accessJournal of UrologyStone Disease: Surgical Therapy IV1 Apr 2018MP68-03 COMPARISON OF EIGHT DIGITAL (REUSABLE AND DISPOSABLE) FLEXIBLE URETEROSCOPES DEFLECTION PROPERTIES: IN-VITRO STUDY IN 10 DIFFERENT SCOPE SETTINGS Laurian Dragos, Sandra M. Martis, Bhaskar K. Somani, Maria Rodriguez-Monsalve Herrero, Etienne X. Keller, Vincent M.J. De Coninck, Catalin Iacoboaie, Steeve Doizi, Ewa Bres-Niewada, Livius C. Daminescu, Razvan T. Bardan, Emre T. Sener, Salvatore Buttice, Silvia Proietti, and Olivier Traxer Laurian DragosLaurian Dragos More articles by this author , Sandra M. MartisSandra M. Martis More articles by this author , Bhaskar K. SomaniBhaskar K. Somani More articles by this author , Maria Rodriguez-Monsalve HerreroMaria Rodriguez-Monsalve Herrero More articles by this author , Etienne X. KellerEtienne X. Keller More articles by this author , Vincent M.J. De ConinckVincent M.J. De Coninck More articles by this author , Catalin IacoboaieCatalin Iacoboaie More articles by this author , Steeve DoiziSteeve Doizi More articles by this author , Ewa Bres-NiewadaEwa Bres-Niewada More articles by this author , Livius C. DaminescuLivius C. Daminescu More articles by this author , Razvan T. BardanRazvan T. Bardan More articles by this author , Emre T. SenerEmre T. Sener More articles by this author , Salvatore ButticeSalvatore Buttice More articles by this author , Silvia ProiettiSilvia Proietti More articles by this author , and Olivier TraxerOlivier Traxer More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2018.02.2207AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES Due to the high cost and fragility of the reusable digital flexible ureterorenoscopes (fURSs), several single use alternatives have emerged. The goal of our in-vitro study was to determine the deflection properties of these scopes with the working channel empty and occupied by different accessories. METHODS Four single-use (LithoVue, Boston Scientific, USA; Pusen, China; Neoflex, Neoscope, USA; YouCare Tech, China) and four reusable (URF-V2, Olympus, Japan; Flex Xc, Karl Storz, Germany; Cobra vision and Boa vision, Richard Wolf, Germany) fURSs were compared in a total of 10 different settings. The maximal up and down deflection was measured with the working channel empty and then occupied with various tools (200μm, 273μm, 365μm laser fibres; 1.5Fr, 1.9Fr and 2.2Fr baskets; 0.038″ PTFE and 0.035″ nitinol guidewires; Piranha biopsy forceps). Each measurement was performed three times. Deflection angles were calculated using a protractor. A scoring system by adding the total deflection degrees for each scope and each setting was used to compare the fURSs. RESULTS When the channel was occupied, the most cumulative deflection was achieved by NeoFlex (5043°) and the least by YouCare Tech (3912°) (Fig.1,2). The least affect on deflection was caused by the 200μm laser fibre (2198°) for the disposable fURSs, and by 1.5 Fr basket (1971°) for the reusable fURSS. In both reusable and disposable fURSs, the PTFE guidewire caused the maximum impact on scope deflection (Fig.3). Overall, single-use fURSs had better deflection in most settings, except when 365μm laser fibre or guidewires (either PTFE or nitinol) were occupying the working channel (Fig.3). CONCLUSIONS The single-use fURSs seem to have better in-vitro deflection than the reusable scopes. But when thicker, less flexible tools occupied the working channel, the reusable fURSs deflected better. Further evaluation of our findings in clinic settings will help to confirm our findings. © 2018FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 199Issue 4SApril 2018Page: e917 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2018MetricsAuthor Information Laurian Dragos More articles by this author Sandra M. Martis More articles by this author Bhaskar K. Somani More articles by this author Maria Rodriguez-Monsalve Herrero More articles by this author Etienne X. Keller More articles by this author Vincent M.J. De Coninck More articles by this author Catalin Iacoboaie More articles by this author Steeve Doizi More articles by this author Ewa Bres-Niewada More articles by this author Livius C. Daminescu More articles by this author Razvan T. Bardan More articles by this author Emre T. Sener More articles by this author Salvatore Buttice More articles by this author Silvia Proietti More articles by this author Olivier Traxer More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.