Abstract
You have accessJournal of UrologyStone Disease: Surgical Therapy V (MP65)1 Sep 2021MP65-02 STENT SYNDROME. DOES THE DIAMETER MATTER? RESULTS OF A PROSPECTIVE TRIAL Pablo Contreras, María Florencia Frascheri, Nicolás Bonanno, Sofía Butori, Leandro Blas, and Carlos Ameri Pablo ContrerasPablo Contreras More articles by this author , María Florencia FrascheriMaría Florencia Frascheri More articles by this author , Nicolás BonannoNicolás Bonanno More articles by this author , Sofía ButoriSofía Butori More articles by this author , Leandro BlasLeandro Blas More articles by this author , and Carlos AmeriCarlos Ameri More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000002105.02AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Ureteral catheter related symptoms may vary amongst people, depending on many factors. Our objective was to compare the symptoms produced by three different catheter diameters and the impact in the quality of life using a validated questionnaire. METHODS: Between June 2016 and February 2021 we conducted a prospective trial of 180 adults patients with a single ureteral stone who required an ureteral stent placement as a primary treatment. Patients were randomized 1:1:1 depending on catheter´s diameter: 4.7, 6 or 7 Fr, 60 patients in each group. A 26 cm Universa® stent was used in every cases. During the seventh and fourteenth day after the surgery, patients were requested to answer the ureteral stent symptoms questionnaire (USSQ). Results were compared using the unidirectional ANOVA test. RESULTS: The mean age was 48.3 years (±14.9), male/female relation was 2.37/1. Most of the patients referred pain: 93% claim being unable to live with symptoms, 47% could not engage in sexual activity and 70% would be very unhappy in case of requiring another stent again. After the statistical analysis, 4.7 Fr. stents produced significantly less urinary symptoms than 6 and 7 Fr. catheters. CONCLUSIONS: Ureteral catheter related symptoms deeply affected the quality of life in most cases. The 4,7 Fr. catheter produced significantly less urinary symptoms than 6 and 7 Fr. catheters. Source of Funding: None © 2021 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 206Issue Supplement 3September 2021Page: e1119-e1119 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2021 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Pablo Contreras More articles by this author María Florencia Frascheri More articles by this author Nicolás Bonanno More articles by this author Sofía Butori More articles by this author Leandro Blas More articles by this author Carlos Ameri More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Loading ...
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have