Abstract

You have accessJournal of UrologyCME1 Apr 2023MP60-16 DORSAL/ DORSO-LATERAL ONLAY BUCCAL MUCOSAL GRAFT VERSUS VENTRAL ONLAY LOCAL PENILE SKIN FLAP IN COMPLEX ANTERIOR URETHRAL STRICTURES; A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED STUDY Ahmed Tawakol, Mohammed Abdel-Rassoul, Mohamed Abdelwahab, Mohamed Elghoneimy, Ahmed Y. Abdelaziz, Ahmed Rammah, Mohamed Elgammal, and Amr Elkady Ahmed TawakolAhmed Tawakol More articles by this author , Mohammed Abdel-RassoulMohammed Abdel-Rassoul More articles by this author , Mohamed AbdelwahabMohamed Abdelwahab More articles by this author , Mohamed ElghoneimyMohamed Elghoneimy More articles by this author , Ahmed Y. AbdelazizAhmed Y. Abdelaziz More articles by this author , Ahmed RammahAhmed Rammah More articles by this author , Mohamed ElgammalMohamed Elgammal More articles by this author , and Amr ElkadyAmr Elkady More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000003318.16AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Anterior urethral stricture is a challenging disease. Multiplicity of surgical techniques denotes that none is ideal. Our aim is to compare the use of buccal mucosal grafts (BG) versus local penile skin flaps (PF) in patients with complex anterior urethral strictures regarding success rates and complications. METHODS: A total of 34 adult patients with complex anterior urethral stricture were included. A complex anterior urethral stricture was defined as a stricture length of>2 cm and/or previous failed procedures, including urethral dilatation, internal optical urethrotomy and urethroplasty. We randomized patients to undergo either buccal mucosa dorsal/ dorso-lateral onlay graft or ventral onlay local penile skin flap urethroplasty. We compared operative time, estimated blood loss, complications, and succcess rates in both groups. Successful treatment outcome was defined as no further treatment of the urethral stricture required after urethroplasty and peak flow rate>15 ml/s. RESULTS: Mean follow up was 22.3 months in BG group vs 18.9 months in PF group. The site of the stricture, the median stricture length (40 mm in BG group Vs. 50 mm in PF group) and mean operative time were not statistically different between the two groups. Estimated blood loss was higher in PF group (median 400 ml and 300 ml in PF and BG group respectively, p=0.003); statistically significant but clinically insignificant.Two patients (11.8%) in each group developed wound infection. In PF group, one patient (5.9%) had urinary fistula, and one patient (5.9%) presented by mild ventral chordee post operatively. The success rates in the buccal mucosal and penile flap groups were similar (88.2%). CONCLUSIONS: Dorsal/ dorso-lateral onlay buccal mucosal graft and ventral onlay penile skin flap urethroplasty provided similar success rates. Complications were higher in the penile skin flap group. Both techniques can be used for the treatment of complex anterior urethral strictures with good outcome based on the surgeon's expertise. Source of Funding: None © 2023 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 209Issue Supplement 4April 2023Page: e849 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2023 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Ahmed Tawakol More articles by this author Mohammed Abdel-Rassoul More articles by this author Mohamed Abdelwahab More articles by this author Mohamed Elghoneimy More articles by this author Ahmed Y. Abdelaziz More articles by this author Ahmed Rammah More articles by this author Mohamed Elgammal More articles by this author Amr Elkady More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.