Abstract

You have accessJournal of UrologyCME1 Apr 2023MP59-19 FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH THE USE OF LOWER ENERGY DENSITY IN GREEN LASER PROSTATE PHOTO-VAPORIZATION Laura Zuluaga, Mauricio Plata, Carlos Gustavo Trujillo, Jessica Santander, Maria Paula Mogollon, Juan Ignacio Caicedo, Julian Azuero, Cesar Diaz Ritter, Claudia Colmenares, and Martin Rondón Laura ZuluagaLaura Zuluaga More articles by this author , Mauricio PlataMauricio Plata More articles by this author , Carlos Gustavo TrujilloCarlos Gustavo Trujillo More articles by this author , Jessica SantanderJessica Santander More articles by this author , Maria Paula MogollonMaria Paula Mogollon More articles by this author , Juan Ignacio CaicedoJuan Ignacio Caicedo More articles by this author , Julian AzueroJulian Azuero More articles by this author , Cesar Diaz RitterCesar Diaz Ritter More articles by this author , Claudia ColmenaresClaudia Colmenares More articles by this author , and Martin RondónMartin Rondón More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000003312.19AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Energy density (ED) (kJ/mL) measures the amount of Joules used in relation to prostate volume (PV). ED appears to be related to adequate tissue removal and probably improved mid-term outcomes in patients treated with photo-vaporization (PVP) of the prostate with GreenLight laser. We aim to assess associated factors with a lesser ED delivery in prostate photo-vaporization. METHODS: Data was retrospectively collected from a single center database with 748 patients who underwent surgery between 2012 and 2019. Groups were divided according to intra-operative energy delivered to the prostate. Group 1: < 4.0 and group 2: ≥4.0 kJ/mL. Peri and postoperative outcomes were assessed. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine the statistically significant variables associated with the use of low ED. RESULTS: General characteristics are shown in Table 1. Group 1 had a total of 36% (n=268), and Group 2 had 64% (n=480) patients. Bivariate analysis was performed, and statistically significant association was observed for higher PV (OR=1.02 [1.02-1.01] IC 95% p-value <0.01), history of combination therapy (OR=1.5 [2-1.1] IC95% p-value=0.01) and postoperative longer bladder catheterization time. After controlling by confounding variables, the multivariate analysis showed that for patients with lower ED delivered acute urinary retention (AUR) appeared to be a protective factor (OR=0.6 [0.9-0.4] IC95% p-value=0.01), and a larger prostate volume (OR=1.02 [1.3-1.02] IC95% p-value <0.01) was associated with lesser ED. CONCLUSIONS: After analyzing factors like surgeons' expertise and comorbidity, we found that PV is shown to be associated with lower energy density delivery and potentially associated with worse functional outcomes. Source of Funding: No funding was received © 2023 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 209Issue Supplement 4April 2023Page: e816 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2023 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Laura Zuluaga More articles by this author Mauricio Plata More articles by this author Carlos Gustavo Trujillo More articles by this author Jessica Santander More articles by this author Maria Paula Mogollon More articles by this author Juan Ignacio Caicedo More articles by this author Julian Azuero More articles by this author Cesar Diaz Ritter More articles by this author Claudia Colmenares More articles by this author Martin Rondón More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call