Abstract

You have accessJournal of UrologyCME1 May 2022MP57-07 IMPACT OF THE MINIMALLY INVASIVE APPROACH ON MORBIDITY OF SALVAGE RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY Marlon Perera, Antoni Vilaseca, Amy Tin, Daniel Nguyen, Renato Carradi, Adam Touijer, Nicole Benfante, Daniel Sjoberg, Vincent Laudone, Peter Scardino, James Eastham, and Karim Touijer Marlon PereraMarlon Perera More articles by this author , Antoni VilasecaAntoni Vilaseca More articles by this author , Amy TinAmy Tin More articles by this author , Daniel NguyenDaniel Nguyen More articles by this author , Renato CarradiRenato Carradi More articles by this author , Adam TouijerAdam Touijer More articles by this author , Nicole BenfanteNicole Benfante More articles by this author , Daniel SjobergDaniel Sjoberg More articles by this author , Vincent LaudoneVincent Laudone More articles by this author , Peter ScardinoPeter Scardino More articles by this author , James EasthamJames Eastham More articles by this author , and Karim TouijerKarim Touijer More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000002640.07AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: We aimed to report the morbidity profile of salvage radical prostatectomy (SRP) and assess the impact of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) on postoperative complications and functional outcomes. METHODS: A total of 293 patients underwent SRP; 232 underwent open SRP and 61 underwent laparoscopic SRP with or without robotic assistance. Complications were recorded and classified into standardized categories. Cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients (10%) experienced grade 3 complications within 30 days, 22 (9.5%) after open and 7 (11%) after MIS (difference=-2%; 95% C.I. -11%, 7%; p=0.6). Between 30 to 90 days after surgery, 7.3% of patients in the open group and 10% in the MIS group had grade 3 complications (difference=-2.5%; 95% C.I. -11%, 6%; p=0.5). The most common complication was bladder neck contracture (BNC), representing 40% of the 30–90 day complications. Within one year of SRP, 81 patients (31%, 95% C.I. 25%, 37%) developed BNC; we saw non-significant lower rates in MIS (25% vs 32%; p=0.4). Five year CSS and OS was 95% and 88% for the entire cohort, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our outcomes suggest poor functional recovery after SRP, regardless of the operative approach. Currently there is no evidence favoring the use of open or MIS approach. Further studies are required to ensure comparable outcomes between these approaches. Source of Funding: This work was supported by the Sidney Kimmel Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancers at MSK, the NIH/NCI grant P50 CA092629, and the NIH/NCI Cancer Center Support Grant to Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (P30 CA008748). Marlon Perera is sponsored by the Australian-America Fulbright Commission administered through a 2021-2022 Fulbright Future Scholarship funded by The Kinghorn Foundation © 2022 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 207Issue Supplement 5May 2022Page: e983 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2022 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Marlon Perera More articles by this author Antoni Vilaseca More articles by this author Amy Tin More articles by this author Daniel Nguyen More articles by this author Renato Carradi More articles by this author Adam Touijer More articles by this author Nicole Benfante More articles by this author Daniel Sjoberg More articles by this author Vincent Laudone More articles by this author Peter Scardino More articles by this author James Eastham More articles by this author Karim Touijer More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF DownloadLoading ...

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.