Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Estimating the risk of competing mortality is of importance in men with early prostate cancer in order to choose the most appropriate way of management and to avoid overor undertreatment. We investigated the association the level of education with different causes of death after radical prostatectomy. METHODS: The study sample consisted of 2630 patients with complete data on level of education (college or university degree or master craftsmen or comparable profession versus others), histopathological tumor stage (organ confined versus extracapsular), lymph node status (negative versus positive) and prostatectomy specimen Gleason score (<7 versus 7 versus 8-10) who underwent radical prostatectomy between 1992 and 2007. Overall, prostate cancer-specific, competing and second cancer-related mortality were study endpoints. Cox proportional hazard models for competing risks were used to study combined effects of the variables on these endpoints. RESULTS: A higher level of education was independently associated with decreased overall mortality after radical prostatectomy (hazard ratio, HR, 0.75, 95% confidence interval, CI, 0.62-0.91, p1⁄40.0037). The mortality difference was attributable to decreased second cancer mortality (HR 0.59, 95% CI 0.40-0.85, p1⁄40.0052) and non-cancer mortality (HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.55-0.98, p1⁄40.0345) but not to differences in prostate cancer-specific mortality (HR 1.16, 95% CI 0.791.69, p1⁄40.4536 in the full model). CONCLUSIONS: The level of education might serve as an independent prognostic parameter supplementary to age, comorbidity and smoking status in order to estimate the risk of competing mortality and to choose optimal treatment for men with early prostate cancer who are candidates for radical prostatectomy.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.