Abstract
You have accessJournal of UrologyTrauma/Reconstruction/Diversion: Urethral Reconstruction (including Stricture, Diverticulum) III (MP56)1 Sep 2021MP56-20 LONG-TERM OUTCOMES AND COMPLICATIONS OF MODIFIED LINGUAL MUCOSA GRAFT RECONSTRUCTIVE TECHNIQUE FOR ANTERIOR URETHRAL STRICTURE Chao Feng, Yue-min Xu, Ying-long Sa, Jiong Zhang, Hong xie, Chong-rui Jin, Jie-min Si, Lu-jie Song, Kai-le Zhang, and Qiang Fu Chao FengChao Feng More articles by this author , Yue-min XuYue-min Xu More articles by this author , Ying-long SaYing-long Sa More articles by this author , Jiong ZhangJiong Zhang More articles by this author , Hong xieHong xie More articles by this author , Chong-rui JinChong-rui Jin More articles by this author , Jie-min SiJie-min Si More articles by this author , Lu-jie SongLu-jie Song More articles by this author , Kai-le ZhangKai-le Zhang More articles by this author , and Qiang FuQiang Fu More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000002086.20AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: The feasibility and reliability of lingual mucosa graft (LMG) for urethroplasty has been confirmed. In this study, we tried to evaluate the long term results of LMG urethroplasty and to analyze the impact factors for the surgical outcome of LMG reconstruction. METHODS: This retrospective study conclude 105 male patients with anterial urethral strictures. The etiology of strictures included lichen sclerosis, trauma, inflammatory, iatrogenic and idiopathic. Modified lingual mucosa graft harvesting technique was used in all cases. One side dissection dorsal onlay technique (Kulkarni technique) was used for reconstruction. The cases were followed up 6 months, 2 years and 5 years after discharge. RESULTS: The mean follow-up duration was 33.77±19.43 months. The average length of stricture was 7.45±4.22 cm. The average length and width of lingual mucosa graft were 7.13±3.95 cm and 1.50±0.45 cm, respectively. By the 6 months after operation, 77.17% cases were recorded a good result. At the end of 2 years, 80.95% cases still maintained an idea outcome. Within 5 years follow-up, only 7 cases complained about the oral complications since 6 months after the operation. The width and length of graft was not related with surgical outcome and complication. However, age showed the relationship with short term surgical outcome. CONCLUSIONS: The modified lingual mucosa graft reconstructive technique has been proved to be used for various anterior urethral stricture feasibly. For the long-term results, it showed the good outcome and few complications. The age might be the independent impact factors for the short term surgical ooutcome. Source of Funding: None © 2021 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 206Issue Supplement 3September 2021Page: e976-e977 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2021 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Chao Feng More articles by this author Yue-min Xu More articles by this author Ying-long Sa More articles by this author Jiong Zhang More articles by this author Hong xie More articles by this author Chong-rui Jin More articles by this author Jie-min Si More articles by this author Lu-jie Song More articles by this author Kai-le Zhang More articles by this author Qiang Fu More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Loading ...
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.