Abstract

You have accessJournal of UrologyBladder Cancer: Invasive IV1 Apr 2017MP54-18 THE USE OF URETHRAL FROZEN SECTION DURING RADICAL CYSTECTOMY MAY IMPROVE CANCER-SPECIFIC AND RECURRENCE-FREE SURVIVAL benoit peyronnet, gregory verhoest, quentin alimi, lauranne tondut, vivien graffeille, romain mathieu, andrea manunta, karim bensalah, francois guille, solene-florence kammerer-jacquet, and nathalie rioux-leclercq benoit peyronnetbenoit peyronnet More articles by this author , gregory verhoestgregory verhoest More articles by this author , quentin alimiquentin alimi More articles by this author , lauranne tondutlauranne tondut More articles by this author , vivien graffeillevivien graffeille More articles by this author , romain mathieuromain mathieu More articles by this author , andrea manuntaandrea manunta More articles by this author , karim bensalahkarim bensalah More articles by this author , francois guillefrancois guille More articles by this author , solene-florence kammerer-jacquetsolene-florence kammerer-jacquet More articles by this author , and nathalie rioux-leclercqnathalie rioux-leclercq More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2017.02.1690AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES Routine use of urethral and uretreral frozen section (FS) during radical cystectomy for bladder cancer is a controversial issue with contradictory findings concerning ureteral FS and very few data concerning urethral FS. Moreover, previous reports aimed to assess the impact of positive FS on oncological outcomes but none have compared the impact of FS vs. no FS on oncological ouctomes. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of urethral and ureteral FS use on oncological outcomes after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer. METHODS All patients who underwent a radical cystectomy for bladder cancer between 1995 and 2015 were included in a single-center retrospective study. The use of ureteral and urethral FS varied according to surgeons preference (routine for some, never for others) but not according to the tumors' characteristics. Patients were divided into different groups according to the use of ureteral and/or urethral FS (FS vs. no FS). Preoperative data and the rate of positive margins were compared between groups. The prognostic factors for cancer-specific survival (CSS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were sought in univariate analysis using the log-rank test and in multivariate analysis using a cox regression model. RESULTS Out of 329 patients included in this study, ureteral FS were performed in 132 (40%) and urethral FS in 183 (56%) respectivley respectively. Thirteen urethral FS were positive (7.1%) resulting in 10 additional urethrectomy. Fourteen ureteral FS (10.6%) were invaded resulting in 8 additional ureteral resections and 1 nephroureterectomy. The use of urethral FS was associated with a decrease in positive margins rate (6% vs. 23%; RR = 0.27; p <0.0001). Conversely, the use of ureteral FS had no impact on the rate of positive margins (12% vs.14%; RR = 0.85; p = 0.58). The use of ureteral FS had no impact on survival whereas the routine use of urethral FS was a prognostic factor for RFS and CSS in univariate (5-years RFS: 51.5% vs. 32%; p <0.0001 and 5-year CSS: 65.1% vs. 50.5%) and multivariate analysis (HR = 1.7; p= 0.003 and HR=1.4; p=0.04 respectively). CONCLUSIONS This study is the first to asses the impact of urethral and ureteral FS use on oncological outcomes after radical cystectomy. The routine use of urethral FS was associated with adecreased rate of positive surgical margins and improved recurrence-free survival and cancer-specific survival. Conversely, the use of ureteral frozen section had no impact on oncological outcomes. © 2017FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 197Issue 4SApril 2017Page: e728-e729 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2017MetricsAuthor Information benoit peyronnet More articles by this author gregory verhoest More articles by this author quentin alimi More articles by this author lauranne tondut More articles by this author vivien graffeille More articles by this author romain mathieu More articles by this author andrea manunta More articles by this author karim bensalah More articles by this author francois guille More articles by this author solene-florence kammerer-jacquet More articles by this author nathalie rioux-leclercq More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.