Abstract

You have accessJournal of UrologyCME1 Apr 2023MP54-10 IMPACT OF URINARY INCONTINENCE AFTER RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY ON WORK STATUS, QUALITY OF LIFE AND TIME TO SURGICAL TREATMENT Avery Braun, Samuel Washington, Janet Cowan, Matthew Cooperberg, Lindsay Hampson, and Peter Carroll Avery BraunAvery Braun More articles by this author , Samuel WashingtonSamuel Washington More articles by this author , Janet CowanJanet Cowan More articles by this author , Matthew CooperbergMatthew Cooperberg More articles by this author , Lindsay HampsonLindsay Hampson More articles by this author , and Peter CarrollPeter Carroll More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000003307.10AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) after radical prostatectomy (RP) can impact quality of life, work status and need for additional surgery. We aim to characterize the cumulative incidence of SUI procedures and report changes in urinary function (UF) and bother (UB), physical function (PF) and work status 1 year after RP. METHODS: Men with prostate cancer (PCa) treated by primary RP (1998-2016) were selected from CaPSURE. SUI was defined as use of any urinary pads per day (ppd) 1 year after RP. SUI procedure was tracked by CPT codes for urinary sling and artificial sphincter. Patients reported work status (full-time paid, part-time paid, unpaid), UF and UB scores (0-100) using UCLA PCa Index and PF using SF36 Index. Associations of incontinence with changes in UF, UB and PF and work status were assessed (ANOVA). Lifetable estimates and Cox proportional hazards regression were used to evaluate risk of undergoing a SUI procedure. RESULTS: Of 2,989 men treated with RP, 664 (22%) reported SUI at 1 year. Mean age was 61 years. More men with SUI had ≥GG2, intermediate to high-risk disease and non-nerve sparing surgery (all p<0.01). Cumulative incidence of SUI procedures was 1.4% at 10 years after RP (0 ppd: 0,3%; 3+ ppd: 12.9%) with median time to intervention of 48 months (IQR 27, 84). SUI procedures comprised of 53% AUS, 24% slings, 9% both and 15% unspecified. Older age (HR 2.68 per 10 years, 95% CI 1.41-5.08, p<0.01) and number of ppd at 1 year (HR 3.20, 95% CI 2.27-4.50, p<0.01) were associated with higher risk of undergoing SUI procedure. UF scores declined significantly from 94 at baseline to 77 at 1 year after RP, while UB and PF remained stable. After RP, UF, UB and PF were inversely associated with increasing number of ppd from 0 to 3+ (all p<0.01). (Figure 1a) Incontinence status (SUI 15% vs no SUI 14%) was not associated with change from paid (FT or PT) to unpaid work at 1 year. QOL scores were not associated with work status. (Figure 1b). CONCLUSIONS: SUI at 1 year after RP may occur in up to 22% of patients; however, 10-year rate of SUI procedure was low at 1.4% with median time to intervention of 48 months. Incontinence affected urinary QOL but did not significantly impact work status. This information suggests that men with SUI after RP may continue to work and go under-treated despite impact on quality of life. Source of Funding: UCSF Goldberg-Benioff Program in Translational Cancer Biology © 2023 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 209Issue Supplement 4April 2023Page: e757 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2023 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Avery Braun More articles by this author Samuel Washington More articles by this author Janet Cowan More articles by this author Matthew Cooperberg More articles by this author Lindsay Hampson More articles by this author Peter Carroll More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.