Abstract

You have accessJournal of UrologyCME1 Apr 2023MP53-02 PEDIATRIC RENAL TRAUMA AT A LEVEL-1 TRAUMA CENTER IN RURAL STATE: 10-YEAR INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW AND PROTOCOL IMPLEMENTATION Zachary Werner, Luke O'Connor, Ahmed Abdelhalim, and Osama Al-Omar Zachary WernerZachary Werner More articles by this author , Luke O'ConnorLuke O'Connor More articles by this author , Ahmed AbdelhalimAhmed Abdelhalim More articles by this author , and Osama Al-OmarOsama Al-Omar More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000003301.02AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: There is no consensus on the ideal management of pediatric renal trauma (PRT); therefore protocols tend to be institution-specific. This study aimed to characterize PRT at a rural level-1 trauma center and to develop a standardized protocol. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed a prospectively maintained database of PRT at our institution from 2009-2019. Injuries were characterized based on renal trauma grade, associated multi-organ involvement and need for intervention. We subsequently appraised the benefit of patient transfer from regional hospitals and the impact of follow-up imaging on patient care. RESULTS: Of the 250 patients admitted with a diagnosis of renal trauma, 50 were under the age of eighteen. Of those, 32/50 (68%) patients had low-grade (grade I-III) injuries with the remaining 18/50 (32%) diagnosed with high grade (IV-V) injuries. All grade I-III injuries were managed conservatively without requiring invasive intervention. Among patients with low-grade trauma, 21/32 (65.5%) were transferred from an outside facility. For patients with high grade injuries, 9/18 (50%) required surgical intervention. Of the patient with high grade injuries, 2/18 (11%) had their management escalated as a result of follow up imaging. Based on data from our institution, we developed pediatric-specific renal trauma protocol which was implemented in early 2021 (Figure 1). CONCLUSIONS: Isolated, low-grade PRT can be managed conservatively at regional hospitals without needing transfer to a Level 1 Trauma Center. However, those with high-grade injuries should be monitored closely as these patients may require intervention. Development of PRT protocol will help to safely triage this population and identify those that require transfer to tertiary care center. Source of Funding: None © 2023 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 209Issue Supplement 4April 2023Page: e712 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2023 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Zachary Werner More articles by this author Luke O'Connor More articles by this author Ahmed Abdelhalim More articles by this author Osama Al-Omar More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call