Abstract

You have accessJournal of UrologyCME1 Apr 2023MP47-01 LIMITATIONS OF PARENCHYMAL VOLUME ANALYSIS (PVA) FOR ESTIMATING SPLIT RENAL FUNCTION (SRF) & NEW BASELINE GFR (NBGFR) AFTER RADICAL NEPHRECTOMY (RN) Kieran Lewis, Carlos Munoz-Lopez, Worapat Attawettayanon, João Pedro Emrich Accioly, Nityam Rathi, Zaeem Lone, Rebecca Campbell, Jihad Kaouk, Georges-Pascal Haber, Mohamad Eltemamy, Venkatesh Krishnamurthi, Robert Abouassaly, Christopher Weight, and Steven Campbell Kieran LewisKieran Lewis More articles by this author , Carlos Munoz-LopezCarlos Munoz-Lopez More articles by this author , Worapat AttawettayanonWorapat Attawettayanon More articles by this author , João Pedro Emrich AcciolyJoão Pedro Emrich Accioly More articles by this author , Nityam RathiNityam Rathi More articles by this author , Zaeem LoneZaeem Lone More articles by this author , Rebecca CampbellRebecca Campbell More articles by this author , Jihad KaoukJihad Kaouk More articles by this author , Georges-Pascal HaberGeorges-Pascal Haber More articles by this author , Mohamad EltemamyMohamad Eltemamy More articles by this author , Venkatesh KrishnamurthiVenkatesh Krishnamurthi More articles by this author , Robert AbouassalyRobert Abouassaly More articles by this author , Christopher WeightChristopher Weight More articles by this author , and Steven CampbellSteven Campbell More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000003293.01AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Accurate prediction of NBGFR after RN can be important for counseling about RN vs. partial nephrectomy in some patients. SRF-based models have been shown to be most accurate for predicting NBGFR after RN, and PVA appears to be superior to nuclear renal scans (NRS) for this purpose. However, data regarding the potential limitations of PVA remain sparse. Our objective was to identify factors associated with PVA inaccuracy. METHODS: 241 RCC patients who underwent RN (2006-2021) with preop. CT/MRI and NRS were included for analysis. Our SRF-based model was: Predicted NBGFR=1.25(Global GFRPre-RN)(SRFContra), with SRF determined by PVA or NRS. Patients were grouped by PVA accuracy: PVAO (PVA over predicted NBGFR by >20%), PVAU (PVA under predicted NBGFR by >20%) and PVAA (PVA accurately predicted NBGFR). Accuracy of NRS was also studied in a similar manner. RESULTS: Six patients (2.5%) were excluded from PVA due to severely altered renal architecture (e.g. PCKD). PVA accurately predicted NBGFR for 83% (196/235) of patients and over/underpredicted NBGFR in 7% and 9%, respectively. NRS only accurately predicted NBGFR for 66% of patients and over/under predicted NBGFR in 22% and 13% of patients, respectively. PVAO had more patients with active/recent hydronephrosis compared to both PVAU /PVAA (29% vs 14% vs 10%, p=0.05). Prior renal infarct (p=0.01) and infiltrative renal mass (IRM) (p=0.002) were associated with PVA inaccuracy in both directions. In contrast, NRS inaccuracy was random and did not associate with hydronephrosis, prior renal infarct, or IRM (all p>0.3). Overall, 30% of patients fell into cohorts where accuracy of PVA was less reliable, but even in these situations PVA was non-inferior to NRS. CONCLUSIONS: PVA accuracy is reduced for IRMs likely due to difficulty distinguishing the true margins of the tumor and, in about 3% of patients, severe disruption of the architecture rendered PVA impossible (e.g. PCKD). Disease processes that distort the volume/function relationship, such as active/recent hydronephrosis, can lead to PVAO, because measured mass may not function optimally. Awareness of cohorts where PVA can be less accurate has clinical utility. However, even in these cohorts, PVA was still non-inferior to NRS, and it remains a cost effective tool for determining SRF/NBGFR. Further study of other processes that can affect the volume/function relationship, such as active or chronic pyelonephritis, or that can affect the degree of renal functional compensation, such as extremes of age, will be required. Source of Funding: None © 2023 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 209Issue Supplement 4April 2023Page: e642 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2023 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Kieran Lewis More articles by this author Carlos Munoz-Lopez More articles by this author Worapat Attawettayanon More articles by this author João Pedro Emrich Accioly More articles by this author Nityam Rathi More articles by this author Zaeem Lone More articles by this author Rebecca Campbell More articles by this author Jihad Kaouk More articles by this author Georges-Pascal Haber More articles by this author Mohamad Eltemamy More articles by this author Venkatesh Krishnamurthi More articles by this author Robert Abouassaly More articles by this author Christopher Weight More articles by this author Steven Campbell More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.