Abstract
You have accessJournal of UrologyCME1 May 2022MP44-13 STONE CULTURES FOR URETEROSCOPY: ARE THEY NECESSARY AND WHO NEEDS THEM? RESULTS FROM A SINGLE INSTITUTION SERIES Daniel Wong, Kenneth Sands, and Alana Desai Daniel WongDaniel Wong More articles by this author , Kenneth SandsKenneth Sands More articles by this author , and Alana DesaiAlana Desai More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000002610.13AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Stone cultures are recommended for high risk PCNL however their utility during ureteroscopy is less understood. We evaluate stone culture as a factor for post ureteroscopy infectious complications and determine which characteristics are associated with positive stone culture to better guide management. METHODS: Using an institutional database of stone extraction cases from 2016-2020, we evaluate all ureteroscopy cases in which stone culture was sent. We perform univariate analysis to identify factors associated with postop infection as defined by T>38°C, WBC >12K or <4K, HR >90, or UTI within 30 days of procedure. Logistic regression was performed on variables historically associated with postop infection. Univariate analysis was performed to determine factors associated with positive stone culture, followed by logistic regression using statistically significant variables. RESULTS: Of 274 ureteroscopy cases where stone culture was obtained, 71(25%) had a positive stone culture and 33(12%) had a postop infection.(Figure 1) Female sex and positive stone culture were associated with post-op infection. Positive stone culture remained the only significant predictor of postop infection on logistic regression. Predictors of positive stone culture were higher Charleston Comorbidity Index(CCI), operative time, history of UTI, and neurogenic bladder. (Figure 2) In the 33 cases of postop infection, 21 had organisms identified on post-op urine or blood cultures. Preop urine culture and stone culture were congruent with postop culture in 5(23%) and 8(38%) cases respectively. Of 12 cases with no postop organism identified, stone culture was positive in 4(33%) and preop culture was positive in 0. CONCLUSIONS: Stone culture is predictive of postop infection after ureteroscopy. Urologists should prioritize sending stone cultures for high risk patients such as those with neurogenic bladder. Stone culture may provide the only chance at culture directed antibiotic therapy in a portion of cases. Source of Funding: Washington University School of Medicine © 2022 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 207Issue Supplement 5May 2022Page: e757 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2022 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Daniel Wong More articles by this author Kenneth Sands More articles by this author Alana Desai More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF DownloadLoading ...
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.