Abstract

You have accessJournal of UrologyCME1 May 2022MP44-04 REAL-WORLD PRACTICE STONE-FREE RATES AFTER URETEROSCOPY FROM A SURGICAL COLLABORATIVE: MUCH TO IMPROVE Hyung Joon Kim, Stephanie Daignault-Newton, John M. DiBianco, S. Mohammad Jafri, Brian Seifman, Eduardo Kleer, Casey A. Dauw, and Khurshid R. Ghani Hyung Joon KimHyung Joon Kim More articles by this author , Stephanie Daignault-NewtonStephanie Daignault-Newton More articles by this author , John M. DiBiancoJohn M. DiBianco More articles by this author , S. Mohammad JafriS. Mohammad Jafri More articles by this author , Brian SeifmanBrian Seifman More articles by this author , Eduardo KleerEduardo Kleer More articles by this author , Casey A. DauwCasey A. Dauw More articles by this author , and Khurshid R. GhaniKhurshid R. Ghani More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000002610.04AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: The stone-free rate (SFR) is an important outcome measure of quality after ureteroscopy for urinary stones. Recent studies show SFRs may not be as high as previously reported. However, these studies are from expert centers, and data from real-world community practice is lacking. We examined the SFR and its predictors following ureteroscopy among diverse practices in the state of Michigan. METHODS: We used the Michigan Urological Surgery Improvement Collaborative (MUSIC) Reducing Operative Complications from Kidney Stone (ROCKS) registry to identify ureteroscopy cases for renal and ureteral stone location, respectively, treated between 2016 and 2021, that had postoperative imaging. Stone-free was defined as no fragment detected on imaging within 60 days. Practice and surgeon-level SFR variation was assessed. Surgeon volume was categorized according to quartiles of annual volume. Factors associated with SFR were examined using logistic regression. RESULTS: 6,487 ureteroscopies were performed across 29 practices and 164 surgeons, to treat 2,091 (32.2%) renal and 4396 (67.8%) ureteral stones. The SFR was 49.6% and 72.7% for renal and ureteral stone location, respectively. For renal stones, larger stone size, lower pole location, and multiplicity were significantly associated with residual fragments (Table 1). For ureteral stones, female gender, larger stone size, proximal location, multiplicity, positive urine culture, use of ureteral access sheath, and post-ureteroscopy stenting were predictors for low SFR (Table 1). No significant differences in SFRs were identified regarding pre-stenting and surgeon volume. Surgeon variation in the SFR for renal and ureteral stones, when adjusted for risk factors, was 29.0-68.7% (p <0.0001) and 51.4-86.4% (p <0.0001), respectively (Figure 1). CONCLUSIONS: There is substantial surgeon-level variation in the SFR after ureteroscopy in Michigan. Our findings demonstrate the need for quality efforts to improve these outcomes. Source of Funding: Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan © 2022 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 207Issue Supplement 5May 2022Page: e752 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2022 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Hyung Joon Kim More articles by this author Stephanie Daignault-Newton More articles by this author John M. DiBianco More articles by this author S. Mohammad Jafri More articles by this author Brian Seifman More articles by this author Eduardo Kleer More articles by this author Casey A. Dauw More articles by this author Khurshid R. Ghani More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF DownloadLoading ...

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.