Abstract

You have accessJournal of UrologyCME1 Apr 2023MP42-11 SILICONE STENTING FOR CHRONIC URETERAL OBSTRUCTION IMPROVES STENT EXCHANGE FREQUENCY Bebe Eke and Suwaee, Ga Noah Canvasser Bebe EkeBebe Eke More articles by this author and Suwaee, Ga Noah CanvasserSuwaee, Ga Noah Canvasser More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000003280.11AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Chronic ureter stenting is recommended for patients with malignant ureteral obstruction, or with benign ureteral obstruction but cannot tolerate or do not want definitive surgical management. Stents are exchanged at time intervals often limited by stent encrustation; prior in vitro studies have demonstrated that silicone stents have less encrustation. Our objective was to compare patients undergoing chronic exchanges with polymer-based and silicone stents. METHODS: This IRB-approved retrospective study included all adult patients who underwent chronic ureter stent exchange from August 2017 through August 2022. Patients were stented with either a Boston Scientific PercuflexTM Plus or a Cook Black Silicone stent. Demographics, dates of exchange, stent type and size, and the presence of external and luminal encrustation were captured from operative reports. A subset of patients with >8F stents was analyzed given larger stents have lower rates of encrustation. Students t-test and chi-squared analysis were used to compare polymer-based vs silicone stents. RESULTS: In total, 52 patients underwent 165 stent exchanges: 72% were polymer-based (n=119), 28% were silicone (n=44), and 1% were metallic (n=2, excluded). Table 1 lists patient demographics and stent sizes. Mean exchange interval for silicone stents was significantly longer than for polymer-based stents (197±60 vs 139±87 days, p<0.0001). Despite this, there was no significant difference in external encrustation (9 vs 18%, p=0.18) or luminal encrustation (7% vs 4%, p=0.49). Sub-group comparison of stents >8F also showed longer exchange interval (191±40 vs 106±36 days, p<0.0001), similar external encrustation (10.3 vs 24%, p=0.13), and similar luminal encrustation (6.9 vs 5.6%, p=0.82). CONCLUSIONS: Utilizing silicone stents for chronic ureter stent exchanges significantly increases the exchange interval due to lower encrustation rates over similar time periods compared to a polymer-based stent. Further work with other polymer-based and silicone stents is warranted to evaluate the generalizability of these results. Source of Funding: COI: Consultant for Boston Scientific and Cook Medical, this study is unfunded © 2023 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 209Issue Supplement 4April 2023Page: e571 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2023 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Bebe Eke More articles by this author Suwaee, Ga Noah Canvasser More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call