Abstract

You have accessJournal of UrologyCME1 May 2022MP40-10 SURVIVAL OUTCOMES OF UPPER TRACT UROTHELIAL CARCINOMA PATIENTS TREATED WITH THERAPEUTIC ENDOSCOPIC MANAGEMENT Wesley Yip, Peter Reisz, Amy Tin, Nicole Benfante, Eugene Cha, Eugene Pietzak, Ari Hakimi, and Jonathan Coleman Wesley YipWesley Yip More articles by this author , Peter ReiszPeter Reisz More articles by this author , Amy TinAmy Tin More articles by this author , Nicole BenfanteNicole Benfante More articles by this author , Eugene ChaEugene Cha More articles by this author , Eugene PietzakEugene Pietzak More articles by this author , Ari HakimiAri Hakimi More articles by this author , and Jonathan ColemanJonathan Coleman More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000002600.10AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is associated with significant morbidity and renal dysfunction. Interest has increased in endoscopic, kidney-sparing treatment options. We aim to characterize the survival outcomes of UTUC patients treated with therapeutic ureteroscopy (tURS) at our institution. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all patients treated for UTUC with tURS, defined as two or more URS with therapeutic intent to eradicate all visible tumor. Kaplan-Meier figures were created for three outcomes, including progression-free (PFS), metastasis-free (MFS), and cancer-specific survival (CSS). Progression was defined as converting from negative or low to high-grade disease on follow-up URS, proceeding to systemic therapy, or undergoing ureterectomy/nephroureterectomy. The association between each outcome and certain risk factors at diagnostic URS (tumor grade/size/multiplicity, carcinoma in situ, and variant histology) was assessed by univariable Cox proportional hazard regression models. RESULTS: 89 patients underwent tURS between 2010 and 2021. Median age was 70 years (IQR 62, 78), the majority were male (69%), and with clinical Ta disease (81%). 33 (37%) patients underwent tURS at the same time as their initial diagnostic URS. Among the remaining 56 patients, the median time from diagnostic to therapeutic URS was 10 weeks (IQR 5, 21). 43 patients progressed, 5 patients developed metastases, and 3 patients died from disease. Median follow-up among patients who did not progress was 2.1 years. Of the patients who progressed, 12 (28%) had high-grade disease on follow-up URS, 4 (9.3%) underwent systemic therapy, 26 (60%) underwent nephroureterectomy, and 1 (2.2%) underwent ureterectomy. Kaplan-Meier estimated one-year and three-years PFS were 68% (95% CI 58%, 79%) and 58% (95% CI 48%, 70%), respectively (Figure 1). Kaplan-Meier estimated 5-year MFS and CSS were 91% (95% CI 83%, 100%) and 96% (95% CI 91%, 100%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic management is an efficacious treatment option for highly selected UTUC patients based on PFS. A proportion of patients may proceed to salvage therapies; however, metastases and death from disease are rare. Source of Funding: Thompson Family Foundation, Ruth L. Kirschstein National Research Service Award T32CA082088 © 2022 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 207Issue Supplement 5May 2022Page: e677 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2022 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Wesley Yip More articles by this author Peter Reisz More articles by this author Amy Tin More articles by this author Nicole Benfante More articles by this author Eugene Cha More articles by this author Eugene Pietzak More articles by this author Ari Hakimi More articles by this author Jonathan Coleman More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF DownloadLoading ...

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.