Abstract

You have accessJournal of UrologyUrodynamics/Incontinence/Female Urology: Incontinence Therapy II1 Apr 2014MP38-05 RISK FACTORS FOR EXPLANTATION OF ARTIFICIAL URINARY SPHINCTERS: A PROSPECTIVE, MULTICENTER ANALYSIS William Brant, Bradley Erickson, Bryan Voelzke, Christopher Powell, Nejd Alsikafi, Sean Elliott, Christopher McClung, Jeremy Myers, Thomas Smith, and Joshua Broghammer William BrantWilliam Brant More articles by this author , Bradley EricksonBradley Erickson More articles by this author , Bryan VoelzkeBryan Voelzke More articles by this author , Christopher PowellChristopher Powell More articles by this author , Nejd AlsikafiNejd Alsikafi More articles by this author , Sean ElliottSean Elliott More articles by this author , Christopher McClungChristopher McClung More articles by this author , Jeremy MyersJeremy Myers More articles by this author , Thomas SmithThomas Smith More articles by this author , and Joshua BroghammerJoshua Broghammer More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2014.02.1262AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES The purpose of the study was to determine independent risk factors for explantation of artificial urinary sphincters (AUS) from a large, multi-center, prospective outcomes study. METHODS From April 2009 to Februrary 2012, 386 patients with at least 3 months follow-up were treated with AUS for stress urinary incontinence at eight institutions and demographic and surgical data on these men were collected prospectively. Retrospective analysis of the collected data was then performed looking for risk factors predictive for explantation using both univariate and multivariate techniques. Risk factors of particular interest included 1) history of pelvic radiation 2) prior urethroplasty 3) bladder neck contractures 4) prior AUS explantation 5) prior urethral stent. Patients with any of these risk factors were then categorized as high risk (HR). Additionally, we analyzed the affect that transcorporal (TC) and 3.5 cm cuff placement had on explantation risk. RESULTS Explantation occurred in 31 (8.03%) at a median time of 15.1 +/- 7.8 months. Erosion risk did not vary by surgeon (p=0.2). Univariate analysis revealed higher erosion risks for radiated patients (15.9% v 3.6%, p <0.0001), those with urethral stents (33.3% v 7.4%, p = 0.0047), and prior AUS explantation (13.3% v 6.75%, p = 0.06). TC placement of the cuff did not affect erosion risk (10.1% v 7.1%, p = 0.32) but 3.5 cm cuffs resulted in significantly higher rates of erosion (15.9% v 7.0%, p = 0.04). In HR patients, explantation rates were similar in TC patients (11.24% v 15.24%, p = 0.4) but considerably higher when a 3.5 cm cuff was placed (27.3% v 11.6%, p = 0.04). Multivariable logistic regression of significant univariate predictors revealed radiation (OR 4.82, 95% CI 2.02-11.49), urethral stent placement (OR 5.71 (1.2-27.2) and 3.5 cm cuffs (OR 3.2 (1.2 – 8.8) to be independent predictors of explantation. CONCLUSIONS Prior radiation and prior urethral stent placement were independent predictors for AUS explantation in this large multiinstitutional study, as was the use of a 3.5 cm cuff, which resulted in especially high rates of explantation in the HR patients. In HR patients found to have a urethral size < 4.0 cm, 3.5 cm cuffs should be used with caution and a TC cuff placement may result in superior outcomes. © 2014FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 191Issue 4SApril 2014Page: e402 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2014MetricsAuthor Information William Brant More articles by this author Bradley Erickson More articles by this author Bryan Voelzke More articles by this author Christopher Powell More articles by this author Nejd Alsikafi More articles by this author Sean Elliott More articles by this author Christopher McClung More articles by this author Jeremy Myers More articles by this author Thomas Smith More articles by this author Joshua Broghammer More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call