Abstract

You have accessJournal of UrologyKidney Cancer: Epidemiology & Evaluation/Staging I1 Apr 2018MP28-05 COMPLICATIONS FOLLOWING 1053 PERCUTANEOUS CORE RENAL MASS BIOPSIES: RISK FACTORS AND SAFETY ASSESSMENT Natasza Posielski, Anthony Bui, Shane A. Wells, Sara L. Best, Lori Mankowski Gettle, Timothy J. Ziemlewicz, Meghan G. Lubner, J. Louis Hinshaw, Fred T. Lee, Stephen Y Nakada, and E. Jason Abel Natasza PosielskiNatasza Posielski More articles by this author , Anthony BuiAnthony Bui More articles by this author , Shane A. WellsShane A. Wells More articles by this author , Sara L. BestSara L. Best More articles by this author , Lori Mankowski GettleLori Mankowski Gettle More articles by this author , Timothy J. ZiemlewiczTimothy J. Ziemlewicz More articles by this author , Meghan G. LubnerMeghan G. Lubner More articles by this author , J. Louis HinshawJ. Louis Hinshaw More articles by this author , Fred T. LeeFred T. Lee More articles by this author , Stephen Y NakadaStephen Y Nakada More articles by this author , and E. Jason AbelE. Jason Abel More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2018.02.905AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES Percutaneous renal mass biopsy (RMB) is an effective diagnostic tool. Although morbidity of RMB is generally minimal, few studies have investigated risk factors and safety for complications. The purpose of this project is to evaluate patient, tumor, and technical factors associated with procedural complications following RMB. METHODS Consecutive patients treated with percutaneous core RMB from 2003-2017 were identified. Institutional protocol allows RMB with INR ≤ 2.0, platelets > 25,000 and continuation of aspirin (ASA) therapy. Complications ≤30 days were graded using the Clavien-Dindo system. Logistic regression evaluated associations between complications and: age, gender, body mass index (BMI), Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), smoking status, pre-procedure labs (platelets, INR, hemoglobin), ASA, blood pressure during procedure, tumor diameter, Nephrometry score, biopsy needle size, US vs. CT guidance, number of needle passes, presence of trainees, and radiologist′s prior experience. RESULTS Of 1053 patients, 23 (2.2%) patients had procedural complications including: symptomatic hematomas 6(0.6%), gross hematuria 8 (0.8%), severe pain 4 (0.4%), UTI 4 (0.4%) and one patient each with hypotension, pseudoaneurysm and urinary retention. Major complications (≥Clavien 3a) were identified in 5 (0.5%) patients and 11 (1.0%) were admitted to the hospital. No patients had tumor seeding from biopsy. Age, BMI, gender, CCI, smoking status, platelet count, INR, hemoglobin, and blood pressure were not associated with complications (p=0.48, 0.09, 0.10, 0.33, 0.47, 0.16, 0.41, 0.46, 0.30). No associations were identified with complications and tumor diameter, Nephrometry score, needle size, type of radiologic guidance, or number of needle passes (0.30, 0.18, 1.0, 0.27, 0.10). RMB was performed in 401 (38%) patients on ASA and 51 (4.8%) with INR > upper limit normal. Risk was not increased in patients on ASA or for patients with INR 1.3-2.0, p=0.23 and 0.41, respectively. Trainee presence did not increase complication rate, p=0.24. Twelve radiologists performed at least 50 RMB, median 83 (range 54-136). Complications rates ranged from 0-2.3%, but no difference was identified between the most and least experienced radiologists, p=0.21. Risk was not increased during radiologist′s first 50 cases, p=0.23. CONCLUSIONS Renal mass biopsy is safe for patients with platelets > 25,000 or INR 1.3-2.0 and ASA did not increase complication risk. Number of needle passes, BMI, co-morbidities and radiologist experience were also not associated with complications. © 2018FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 199Issue 4SApril 2018Page: e358 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2018MetricsAuthor Information Natasza Posielski More articles by this author Anthony Bui More articles by this author Shane A. Wells More articles by this author Sara L. Best More articles by this author Lori Mankowski Gettle More articles by this author Timothy J. Ziemlewicz More articles by this author Meghan G. Lubner More articles by this author J. Louis Hinshaw More articles by this author Fred T. Lee More articles by this author Stephen Y Nakada More articles by this author E. Jason Abel More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.