Abstract

You have accessJournal of UrologyCME1 Apr 2023MP23-09 COMPARISON OF LOW-POWER VS HIGH-POWER HOLMIUM LASERS IN PAEDIATRIC RIRS OUTCOMES Ee Jean Lim, Esther García Rojo, Stefania Ferreti, Anna Bujons, Olivier Traxer, Danielle Castellani, Yesica Quiroz, Deepak Ragoori, Tanuj Paul Bhatia, Chandra Mohan Vaddi, Claudia Gatti, Khi Yung Fong, Yiloren Tanidir, Bhaskar Kumar Somani, Anil Shrestha, and Vineet Gauhar Ee Jean LimEe Jean Lim More articles by this author , Esther García RojoEsther García Rojo More articles by this author , Stefania FerretiStefania Ferreti More articles by this author , Anna BujonsAnna Bujons More articles by this author , Olivier TraxerOlivier Traxer More articles by this author , Danielle CastellaniDanielle Castellani More articles by this author , Yesica QuirozYesica Quiroz More articles by this author , Deepak RagooriDeepak Ragoori More articles by this author , Tanuj Paul BhatiaTanuj Paul Bhatia More articles by this author , Chandra Mohan VaddiChandra Mohan Vaddi More articles by this author , Claudia GattiClaudia Gatti More articles by this author , Khi Yung FongKhi Yung Fong More articles by this author , Yiloren TanidirYiloren Tanidir More articles by this author , Bhaskar Kumar SomaniBhaskar Kumar Somani More articles by this author , Anil ShresthaAnil Shrestha More articles by this author , and Vineet GauharVineet Gauhar More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000003248.09AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: To compare the outcomes of using low power (up to 30 W) vs high power (up to 120 W) holmium lasers in paediatric retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) and to analyse if the choice of scopes; lasering techniques and the use of access sheath have any influence on the final outcomes. METHODS: We performed a retrospective, multicentre study in a paediatric population (≤18 years of age), who underwent RIRS with holmium laser for treatment of kidney stones between January 2015 and December 2020. Patients were divided into two groups according to laser used: high power holmium laser and low power holmium laser. Clinical, perioperative variables and complications were analyzed. Outcomes were compared between groups using Student's T-test for continuous variables, and for categorical variables were used Chi-square and Fisher's exact test. A multivariable logistic regression analysis model was also performed. RESULTS: 314 patients from 9 centres were included. A high-power holmium laser was used in 97 patients, whereas 217 patients underwent low power holmium laser with a mean age of 10.01 and 9.54, respectively. Clinical and demographic variables were comparable between both groups, except for stone size where the low power group treated slightly larger stones (mean 11.11 mm vs 9.70 mm; p 0.018). In the high-power laser group, a reduction in surgical time was found (mean 64.29 min vs 75.27 min; p 0.018) with significantly higher SFR (mean 81.4% vs 59%; p<0.001) and faster operative time (mean 75.27 min vs 64.29 min; p 0.018). We found no statistical differences in complications rates but overall number of complications was higher in low-power holmium laser group. The multivariate logistic regression model also shows statistically significant results that the low-power holmium laser group has a lower SFR, especially in larger lithiasis (p=0.011or multiple stones, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our real world pediatric multicenter study favors high-power holmium laser and establishes is safety and efficacy in children. With innovations, it would be best adapted to provide the best possible SFR results in a single session for children without compromising safety. Source of Funding: NIL © 2023 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 209Issue Supplement 4April 2023Page: e309 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2023 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Ee Jean Lim More articles by this author Esther García Rojo More articles by this author Stefania Ferreti More articles by this author Anna Bujons More articles by this author Olivier Traxer More articles by this author Danielle Castellani More articles by this author Yesica Quiroz More articles by this author Deepak Ragoori More articles by this author Tanuj Paul Bhatia More articles by this author Chandra Mohan Vaddi More articles by this author Claudia Gatti More articles by this author Khi Yung Fong More articles by this author Yiloren Tanidir More articles by this author Bhaskar Kumar Somani More articles by this author Anil Shrestha More articles by this author Vineet Gauhar More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.