MP23-20 A SINGLE CENTER COMPARATIVE STUDY OF TWO SINGLE USE DIGITAL FLEXIBLE URETEROSCOPY IN THE MANAGEMENT OF RENAL STONES LESS THAN 2 CM

Abstract

You have accessJournal of UrologyCME1 Apr 2023MP23-20 A SINGLE CENTER COMPARATIVE STUDY OF TWO SINGLE USE DIGITAL FLEXIBLE URETEROSCOPY IN THE MANAGEMENT OF RENAL STONES LESS THAN 2 CM Fouad Zanaty, Mohamed Elshazly, Hossam Kandeel, and Baher Salman Fouad ZanatyFouad Zanaty More articles by this author , Mohamed ElshazlyMohamed Elshazly More articles by this author , Hossam KandeelHossam Kandeel More articles by this author , and Baher SalmanBaher Salman More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000003248.20AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: For renal stones <2 cm, guidelines recommend the use of retrograde intrarenal surgery as a first line treatment option. Many available single use flexible ureteroscopy were found. We aim to compare the effectiveness of two single use flexible ureteroscopy; Pusen uscope 3011 versus LithoVue in the management of renal stones less than 2 cm. METHODS: Our study prospectively included 60 patients equally divided in to 2 groups; Pusen group and LithoVue group during the period from June 2020 to June 2021. The included patients were above 18 years old. Perioperative details as operative time, fluoroscopy time, hospital stay and complications were recorded. Stone free rate was assessed. Base purchase cost was also compared. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups regarding age, gender and body mass index (BMI), stones size, side, number and location. The perioperative evaluation and outcome had no statistically significant differences between the 2 groups regarding the operative time, hospital stay, access sheath use, and stone free rate or radiation exposure. Among all cases we had 49 cases (81.6%) with no postoperative complications (21 cases for Pusen group and 28 cases for Lithovue group). The incidence of postoperative complications was significantly higher among Pusen group than lithoVue group (p=0.02). Initial purchase cost for both FURS had no significant difference (p=0.86). CONCLUSIONS: RIRS can be performed effectively with Pusen 3011 and LithoVue single use flexible ureteroscopy in patients diagnosed with renal calculi <2 cm with superior outcomes with LithoVue. Source of Funding: None © 2023 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 209Issue Supplement 4April 2023Page: e314 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2023 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Fouad Zanaty More articles by this author Mohamed Elshazly More articles by this author Hossam Kandeel More articles by this author Baher Salman More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...