Abstract

You have accessJournal of UrologyCME1 Apr 2023MP22-06 ASSESSING THE IMPACT OF BLACK RACE ON WOMEN WITH BLADDER CANCER IN THE UNITED STATES Dhaval Jivanji, Katiana Vazquez-Rivera, Karis Buford, Arshia Sandozi, Mariela Martinez, Allison Polland, Varsha Sinha, Ervin Teper, and Ariel Schulman Dhaval JivanjiDhaval Jivanji More articles by this author , Katiana Vazquez-RiveraKatiana Vazquez-Rivera More articles by this author , Karis BufordKaris Buford More articles by this author , Arshia SandoziArshia Sandozi More articles by this author , Mariela MartinezMariela Martinez More articles by this author , Allison PollandAllison Polland More articles by this author , Varsha SinhaVarsha Sinha More articles by this author , Ervin TeperErvin Teper More articles by this author , and Ariel SchulmanAriel Schulman More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000003247.06AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Women present with more advanced disease and have worse bladder cancer outcomes than men because of social and biological differences. Yet, little is known about how race affects bladder cancer in women. We sought to explore the impact of Black race on women presenting with bladder cancer in the United States. METHODS: The National Cancer Database (NCDB) Hospital Comparison Benchmark Report (HCBR) was examined. Patients from 1,379 participating hospitals diagnosed with bladder cancer from 2011 to 2020 were included. Demographic and clinical characteristics were compared between white and Black women. Two proportion Z-tests were conducted to determine differences between the two groups. RESULTS: In total, 634,900 patients with bladder cancer were identified. Women made up 152,729 (24.1%) patients, of which 129,967 (85.1%) were white and 12,639 (8.3%) were Black. Stratified by race and gender, Black women comprised a larger proportion of cases compared to white women (33.4% vs. 23.4%, p < 0.001). Black women were more likely to have Medicaid (8.6% vs. 3.2%, p < 0.001), live in areas with the highest high school dropout rates (27.0% vs. 9.3%, p < 0.001), have a Charlson comorbidity score of 2 or more (16.4% vs. 11.3%, p < 0.001), and receive care locally (<10 miles traveled) (52.5% vs. 40.1%, p < 0.001). A higher proportion of Black women presented with Stage IV disease compared to their white counterparts (13.1% vs. 8.2%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Compared to white women, Black women comprised a larger percentage of race-stratified cases of bladder cancer and had multiple disparities in insurance status, education, comorbidity index, and stage at presentation. Future studies to better understand the prevalence and etiology of these differences are needed to improve the evaluation, diagnosis, and treatment of women with bladder cancer. Source of Funding: None © 2023 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 209Issue Supplement 4April 2023Page: e298 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2023 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Dhaval Jivanji More articles by this author Katiana Vazquez-Rivera More articles by this author Karis Buford More articles by this author Arshia Sandozi More articles by this author Mariela Martinez More articles by this author Allison Polland More articles by this author Varsha Sinha More articles by this author Ervin Teper More articles by this author Ariel Schulman More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.