Abstract

You have accessJournal of UrologyCME1 May 2022MP17-10 INCREASED LITHOGENIC RISK IN PLANT-BASED MEAT PRODUCTS FOR CHILDREN AND INFANTS Garrett Ungerer, Christine Liaw, Aaron Potretzke, David Sas, Patricio Gargollo, Candace Granberg, and Kevin Koo Garrett UngererGarrett Ungerer More articles by this author , Christine LiawChristine Liaw More articles by this author , Aaron PotretzkeAaron Potretzke More articles by this author , David SasDavid Sas More articles by this author , Patricio GargolloPatricio Gargollo More articles by this author , Candace GranbergCandace Granberg More articles by this author , and Kevin KooKevin Koo More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000002550.10AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: The global prevalence of pediatric nephrolithiasis continues to rise amidst increased sodium and animal protein intake. Recently food products made from plant-based meat products (PBMPs) have gained popularity due to perceived health benefits, social and environmental concerns, increased retail availability, and direct marketing to parents and children. We analyzed PBMPs targeted to children to characterize potential lithogenic risk vs animal protein. METHODS: We performed a dietary assessment using a sample of PBMPs marketed to or commonly consumed by children and commercially available at national retailers. Nutrient profiles for PBMPs were compiled from US Department of Agriculture databases and compared to animal protein sources using standardized serving sizes. We also analyzed nutrient profiles for plant-based infant formulas against typical lactose-based formulas. Primary protein sources were identified using verified ingredient lists. Oxalate content was extrapolated based on dietary data sources. RESULTS: A total of 41 PBMPs were analyzed: chicken (N=18), hot dogs (N=3), meatballs (N=5), fish (N=10), and infant formula (N=5). Most products (76%) contained a high-oxalate ingredient as the primary protein source (soy, wheat, or almond). Average oxalate content per serving was substantially higher in these products (soy 11.6 mg, wheat 3.8 mg, almond 10.2 mg) vs animal protein (negligible oxalate) (Figure 1). PBMPs containing pea protein (24%) had lower average oxalate (0.11 mg). Most PBMPs averaged up to six times more calcium and three times more sodium per serving compared to their respective animal proteins, but less protein content overall (Table 1). CONCLUSIONS: Three-quarters of plant-based meat products for children and infants contain high-oxalate protein sources. Coupled with higher per-serving sodium and calcium amounts, our findings suggest potential increased lithogenic risk of these foods with implications for pediatric nephrolithiasis. Source of Funding: None © 2022 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 207Issue Supplement 5May 2022Page: e288 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2022 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Garrett Ungerer More articles by this author Christine Liaw More articles by this author Aaron Potretzke More articles by this author David Sas More articles by this author Patricio Gargollo More articles by this author Candace Granberg More articles by this author Kevin Koo More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF DownloadLoading ...

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call