Abstract

You have accessJournal of UrologyCME1 Apr 2023MP15-20 URINARY TRACT INFECTION AFTER RADIATION THERAPY OR RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY ON PROGNOSIS OF PATIENTS WITH PROSTATE CANCER: A POPULATION-BASED STUDY Se Young Choi, Jong Hyun Tae, Byung Hoon Chi, In Ho Chang, Tae-Hyoung Kim, Soon Chul Myung, Jung Hoon Kim, Jin Wook Kim, and Yong Seong Lee Se Young ChoiSe Young Choi More articles by this author , Jong Hyun TaeJong Hyun Tae More articles by this author , Byung Hoon ChiByung Hoon Chi More articles by this author , In Ho ChangIn Ho Chang More articles by this author , Tae-Hyoung KimTae-Hyoung Kim More articles by this author , Soon Chul MyungSoon Chul Myung More articles by this author , Jung Hoon KimJung Hoon Kim More articles by this author , Jin Wook KimJin Wook Kim More articles by this author , and Yong Seong LeeYong Seong Lee More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000003235.20AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: We assessed the trends in urinary tract infections (UTIs) and prognosis of patients with prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy (RP) and radiation therapy (RT) as definitive treatment options. METHODS: The data of patients diagnosed with prostate cancer between 2007 and 2016 were collected using the National Health Insurance Service database. The incidence of UTIs was evaluated in patients treated with RT, open/laparoscopic RP, and robot-assisted RP. Cox proportional hazard analysis and Kaplan–Meier analysis were performed to assess survival. RESULTS: In total, 28,887 patients received definitive treatment. In the acute phase (<3 months), RP was associated with more frequent UTIs than RT; however, in the chronic phase (>12 months), RT was associated with more frequent UTIs than RP. The standardized incidence ratios were 2.47 for upper UTIs and 3.04 for lower UTIs. Open/laparoscopic RP was associated with a higher risk of UTIs than RT, whereas robot-assisted RP was not. In the patients with UTIs, the year of PC diagnosis, Charlson Comorbidity Index score, primary treatment, age at UTI diagnosis, type of UTI, hospitalization, and sepsis from UTI were risk factors for overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: In patients treated with RP or RT, the incidence of UTIs was higher than that in the general population. The frequency of UTIs differed between patients treated with RP and RT. Open/laparoscopic RP was associated with a higher risk of UTIs than RT, whereas robot-assisted RP was not. UTI characteristics may be related to a poor prognosis. Source of Funding: This research was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning (NRF-2022R1F1A1076502 & NRF-2022R1A2C2008207) © 2023 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 209Issue Supplement 4April 2023Page: e200 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2023 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Se Young Choi More articles by this author Jong Hyun Tae More articles by this author Byung Hoon Chi More articles by this author In Ho Chang More articles by this author Tae-Hyoung Kim More articles by this author Soon Chul Myung More articles by this author Jung Hoon Kim More articles by this author Jin Wook Kim More articles by this author Yong Seong Lee More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call