Abstract
You have accessJournal of UrologyGeneral & Epidemiological Trends & Socioeconomics: Quality of Life1 Apr 2014MP15-05 HEALTH RELATED QUALITY OF LIFE FROM A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL OF ROBOTIC ASSISTED LAPAROSCOPIC VERSUS OPEN RADICAL CYSTECTOMY Jamie Messer, John Fitzgerald, Robert Svatek, and Dipen Parekh Jamie MesserJamie Messer More articles by this author , John FitzgeraldJohn Fitzgerald More articles by this author , Robert SvatekRobert Svatek More articles by this author , and Dipen ParekhDipen Parekh More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2014.02.558AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES Robotic Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Cystectomy (RARC) has been reported with potential benefits compared to the traditional Open Radical Cystectomy (ORC), though to date no study has compared health related quality of life (HRQOL) outcomes between ORC and RARC in a prospective randomized fashion. METHODS Prospective Randomized Clinical trial evaluating the HRQOL using the FACT-VCI for ORC versus RARC in consecutive patients from July 2009 to June 2011. RESULTS To date 47 patients had met inclusion criteria, with 40 patients being randomized for analysis. The groups consisted of 20 ORC and 20 RARC, each similar with regards to age, sex, race, BMI, comorbidities (ASA), previous abdominal procedures, type of urinary diversion, perioperative chemotherapy, length of stay, and final pathologic stage. We administered the FACT-VCI HRQOL preoperatively and then at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months postoperatively. We noted a return to baseline at 3 months postoperatively in all measured domains with no statistically significant difference between the robotic and open groups. CONCLUSIONS There are no differences in the HRQOL outcomes between ORC and RARC with return of quality of life to baseline 3 months after radical cystectomy. © 2014FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 191Issue 4SApril 2014Page: e145-e146 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2014MetricsAuthor Information Jamie Messer More articles by this author John Fitzgerald More articles by this author Robert Svatek More articles by this author Dipen Parekh More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.