Abstract
You have accessJournal of UrologyProstate Cancer: Staging (MP11)1 Sep 2021MP11-06 PREDICTORS OF GLEASON GRADE UPGRADING ON WHOLEMOUNT PATHOLOGY AFTER MRI-TARGETED VERSUS SYSTEMATIC BIOPSY Nabila Khondakar, Michael Ahdoot, Luke O'Connor, Michael Daneshvar, Nitin Yerram, Cheyenne Williams, Jeunice Owens-Walton, Sandeep Gurram, Patrick Gomella, Jillian Egan, Sherif Mehralivand, Maria Merino, Bradford Wood, Baris Turkbey, and Peter Pinto Nabila KhondakarNabila Khondakar More articles by this author , Michael AhdootMichael Ahdoot More articles by this author , Luke O'ConnorLuke O'Connor More articles by this author , Michael DaneshvarMichael Daneshvar More articles by this author , Nitin YerramNitin Yerram More articles by this author , Cheyenne WilliamsCheyenne Williams More articles by this author , Jeunice Owens-WaltonJeunice Owens-Walton More articles by this author , Sandeep GurramSandeep Gurram More articles by this author , Patrick GomellaPatrick Gomella More articles by this author , Jillian EganJillian Egan More articles by this author , Sherif MehralivandSherif Mehralivand More articles by this author , Maria MerinoMaria Merino More articles by this author , Bradford WoodBradford Wood More articles by this author , Baris TurkbeyBaris Turkbey More articles by this author , and Peter PintoPeter Pinto More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000001984.06AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Despite limitations in diagnostic accuracy, transrectal ultrasound guided-systematic biopsy remains the most common method of prostate cancer (PCa) staging. Many low-risk PCa patients are deemed eligible for active surveillance based on systematic biopsy alone. The objective of this study was to analyze characteristics of patients eligible for AS based on systematic biopsy, who later underwent radical prostatectomy and were found to have Gleason Grade (GG) ≥3 disease. METHODS: Patients were enrolled in a nationally registered clinical trial to evaluate the use of MRI-targeted combined biopsy (NCT00102544). We queried our institutional database for patients who underwent radical prostatectomy between June 2007 and July 2020. Patients with GG1 or GG2 on systematic biopsy were included. Upgrading was determined by comparing GG on systematic and targeted biopsies, to GG on wholemount prostate specimen. Logistic regression models adjusted for age, BMI, and total prostate volume were used to identify predictors of upgrading to GG ≥3 disease. Chi-squared tests were used to compare categorical variables. RESULTS: A total of 773 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy between June 2007 and July 2020 were identified in our institutional database. Among patients who underwent combined biopsy (n = 495), 280 were diagnosed with GG1 (n=03) or GG2 (n=177) on systematic biopsy. The rate of upgrading to GG ≥ 3 was significantly higher for systematic than targeted biopsy (20.0% vs 5.0%, p<0.0001). Increased age at time of surgery was associated with increased odds of upgrading to GG≥ 3 (OR: 1.13, 95% CI: 1.03–1.25, p=.014). Targeted biopsy GG was associated with increased odds of upgrading to GG ≥3 on wholemount pathology (OR: 2.91, 95% CI: 1.74-5.38, p<0.001). Total number of lesions found on MRI was associated with lower odds of upgrading (OR: 0.41, 95% CI: 0.21-0.70, p=0.003). PSA at time of surgery, BMI, highest PIRADS score on MRI, and total prostate volume on MRI were not associated with upgrading to GG ≥ 3 on wholemount pathology (p>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Approximately 1 in 5 patients eligible for AS based on 12-core TRUS-systematic biopsy portion of combined biopsy have GG ≥3 on wholemount histopathology after radical prostatectomy. Older age, GG on MRI-targeted biopsy, and fewer total lesions on pre-biopsy MRI are associated with upgrading to GG ≥3 on wholemount histopathology. Our findings support the use of MRI-targeted biopsy for risk-stratifying patients on AS. Source of Funding: NIH Intramural Funding, NIH Medical Research Scholars Program, Foundation for the NIH © 2021 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 206Issue Supplement 3September 2021Page: e179-e180 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2021 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Nabila Khondakar More articles by this author Michael Ahdoot More articles by this author Luke O'Connor More articles by this author Michael Daneshvar More articles by this author Nitin Yerram More articles by this author Cheyenne Williams More articles by this author Jeunice Owens-Walton More articles by this author Sandeep Gurram More articles by this author Patrick Gomella More articles by this author Jillian Egan More articles by this author Sherif Mehralivand More articles by this author Maria Merino More articles by this author Bradford Wood More articles by this author Baris Turkbey More articles by this author Peter Pinto More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Loading ...
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.