MP08-05 EVALUATING THE QUALITY OF ONLINE HEALTH EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES REGARDING HYPOSPADIAS DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT

Abstract

You have accessJournal of UrologyCME1 May 2022MP08-05 EVALUATING THE QUALITY OF ONLINE HEALTH EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES REGARDING HYPOSPADIAS DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT Yash Shah, Nathan Hyacinthe, Nicolas Fernandez, Carlos Villanueva, Paige Bosse, Melise Keays, and Christopher Long Yash ShahYash Shah More articles by this author , Nathan HyacintheNathan Hyacinthe More articles by this author , Nicolas FernandezNicolas Fernandez More articles by this author , Carlos VillanuevaCarlos Villanueva More articles by this author , Paige BossePaige Bosse More articles by this author , Melise KeaysMelise Keays More articles by this author , and Christopher LongChristopher Long More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000002530.05AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: A diagnosis of hypospadias can be overwhelming for parents. Online patient and parental educational materials are frequently used by patients and family members as supplemental information to assist in understanding their child’s condition, for medical decision making, and for understanding post-surgery care. 98% of parents utilize the Internet for pediatric health advice. It is recommended that online resources be structured at a 6th grade level to ensure broad applicability and comprehension. We hypothesized that academic fellowship training institutional websites would exceed the average American adult’s reading level, impairing patient or caregiver understanding. METHODS: Online hypospadias educational material from all pediatric teaching hospitals with accredited Society of Pediatric Urology training programs in the US and Canada were compiled. Two reviewers independently edited text to remove extraneous information and calculated readability scores using Flesch Reading Ease Score (FRES), Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL), Gunning-Fog Index (GFI), Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG), Coleman-Liau Index (CLI), and Automated Readability Index (ARI). Intra- and inter-observer reliability were measured. RESULTS: Of the 25 online hypospadias educational materials studied, the mean grade level across 5 tests was 11.06±2.21 (Table 1), with a wide range of grade levels across institutions from 7 to 13. None met the recommended 6th grade level. Altogether, the FRES was 50.64±11.66. This is classified as Fairly Difficult with an estimated 10-12 reading grade and 54% of U.S. adult comprehension. 17.30% of words were designated as complex. Only 1 institution had educational materials in a language other than English. Intra- and inter-observer reliability were excellent, with the Pearson correlation coefficient for each tool ≥0.95. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that online hypospadias resources published by leading pediatric hospitals are written above the recommended reading level for patient and caregiver education. Complex word usage was high and there was little information for non-English speaking patients. A standard for online resources for parental education that meets broad comprehension goals should be established to improve awareness and outcomes. Source of Funding: None © 2022 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 207Issue Supplement 5May 2022Page: e126 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2022 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Yash Shah More articles by this author Nathan Hyacinthe More articles by this author Nicolas Fernandez More articles by this author Carlos Villanueva More articles by this author Paige Bosse More articles by this author Melise Keays More articles by this author Christopher Long More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF DownloadLoading ...