Abstract

You have accessJournal of UrologyCME1 Apr 2023MP07-06 TWELVE YEAR EXPERIENCE WITH SALVAGE ROBOTIC SACROCOLPOPEXY. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE AND REASONS FOR FAILURE IN THE INITIAL SURGERY Cassandra Schuster, Spencer Kortum, Benjamin Behers, Genesis Dolgetta, Karim Ghazli, Victoria Bird, and Robert Carey Cassandra SchusterCassandra Schuster More articles by this author , Spencer KortumSpencer Kortum More articles by this author , Benjamin BehersBenjamin Behers More articles by this author , Genesis DolgettaGenesis Dolgetta More articles by this author , Karim GhazliKarim Ghazli More articles by this author , Victoria BirdVictoria Bird More articles by this author , and Robert CareyRobert Carey More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000003222.06AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Robotic sacrocolpopexy (RASCP) is a transabdominal approach for repair of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) that reliably provides durable repair of high grade prolapse. Although reoperation for recurrent prolapse after RASCP should be a rare event, the techniques and problems associated with robotic salvage in these cases is under reported. METHODS: Data is collected from an IRB-approved prospectively maintained database of robotic POP repair in a tertiary care hospital. The surgery is performed with a da Vinci Si or Xi system with 4 robotic ports and 1 assistant port by a single surgeon. Commercially available 4×24 cm Y-shaped wide pore polypropylene mesh is modified to accommodate the anterior and posterior dissections of the vaginal walls and these are attached with running barbed suture with 16-20 sites of fixation. The long Y-arm of the mesh is trimmed to size for attachment to the anterior longitudinal ligament with GoreTex sutures. Posterior peritoneal flaps are created and the entirety of the mesh and repair is completely covered by peritoneum. No mesh or suture is left exposed. Mid-urethral slings were placed at the time of salvage RASCP (sRASCP) to prevent de novo stress incontinence. All repairs restored maximal vaginal length and desired vaginal axis. All patients for RASCP had stage 4 prolapse. There were no conversions from robotic to open. RESULTS: Between 2010 and 2022, a total of 450 patients underwent RASCP at the same institution. 8 (1.8%) were done in the salvage setting with a previous attempt at open or RASCP performed and pre-existing mesh inside the abdomen. On reoperation for these RASCP patients for the purpose of salvage, 8/8 (100%) were found to have no connectivity of the mesh to the anterior longitudinal ligament (ALL). 4/8 (50%) had no connectivity to the either the anterior or posterior vaginal vault. Mean age at salvage operation was 69.5 years and mean BMI 28.5. Cases were completed with robotic console time between 105 and 123 minutes. CONCLUSIONS: sRASCP is a safe and durable surgery for repair of prolapse in the setting of a failed first attempt of RASCP with pre-existing mesh. Every case achieved excellent repair of prolapse. The most common finding is these cases was non-attachment of the mesh to the ALL. All patients required dissection of the ALL for appropriate mesh attachment. Pre-existing mesh can be used to help in repair as long as there is appropriate attachment to the vaginal vault. Pre-existing mesh should be excised if there is no useful vaginal or ALL attachment. Source of Funding: none © 2023 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 209Issue Supplement 4April 2023Page: e86 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2023 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Cassandra Schuster More articles by this author Spencer Kortum More articles by this author Benjamin Behers More articles by this author Genesis Dolgetta More articles by this author Karim Ghazli More articles by this author Victoria Bird More articles by this author Robert Carey More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call