Abstract

There is growing interest in understanding the functional outcomes of species interactions in ecological networks. For many mutualistic networks, including pollination and seed dispersal networks, interactions are generally sampled by recording animal foraging visits to plants. However, these visits may not reflect actual pollination or seed dispersal events, despite these typically being the ecological processes of interest.Frugivorous animals can act as seed dispersers, by swallowing entire fruits and dispersing their seeds, or as pulp peckers or seed predators, by pecking fruits to consume pieces of pulp or seeds. These processes have opposing consequences for plant reproductive success. Therefore, equating visitation with seed dispersal could lead to biased inferences about the ecology, evolution and conservation of seed dispersal mutualisms.Here, we use natural history information on the functional outcomes of pairwise bird–plant interactions to examine changes in the structure of seven European plant–frugivore visitation networks after non‐mutualistic interactions (pulp pecking and seed predation) have been removed. Following existing knowledge of the contrasting structures of mutualistic and antagonistic networks, we hypothesized a number of changes following interaction removal, such as increased nestedness and lower specialization.Non‐mutualistic interactions with pulp peckers and seed predators occurred in all seven networks, accounting for 21%–48% of all interactions and 6%–24% of total interaction frequency. When non‐mutualistic interactions were removed, there were significant increases in network‐level metrics such as connectance and nestedness, while robustness decreased. These changes were generally small, homogenous and driven by decreases in network size. Conversely, changes in species‐level metrics were more variable and sometimes large, with significant decreases in plant degree, interaction frequency, specialization and resilience to animal extinctions and significant increases in frugivore species strength.Visitation data can overestimate the actual frequency of seed dispersal services in plant–frugivore networks. We show here that incorporating natural history information on the functions of species interactions can bring us closer to understanding the processes and functions operating in ecological communities. Our categorical approach lays the foundation for future work quantifying functional interaction outcomes along a mutualism–antagonism continuum, as documented in other frugivore faunas.

Highlights

  • Interspecific interactions play a crucial role in the ecological and evolutionary dynamics of populations and communities (Roemer, Donlan, & Courchamp, 2002; Thompson, 2009), determining energy fluxes and mediating key ecological functions, such as mycorrhizal-­mediated mineral nutrition and animal-­mediated pollination and seed dispersal (Bascompte & Jordano, 2013)

  • We found that several metrics significantly changed following the removal of non-­mutualistic interactions (Figure 4) and that these results were generally consistent across networks

  • At the network level, the magnitude of most changes was small and relatively uniform, suggesting that studies treating plant–frugivore visitation networks as seed dispersal networks are likely robust if they only use network-­level metrics

Read more

Summary

| INTRODUCTION

Interspecific interactions play a crucial role in the ecological and evolutionary dynamics of populations and communities (Roemer, Donlan, & Courchamp, 2002; Thompson, 2009), determining energy fluxes and mediating key ecological functions, such as mycorrhizal-­mediated mineral nutrition and animal-­mediated pollination and seed dispersal (Bascompte & Jordano, 2013). Most plant–frugivore networks analysed in recent studies, and those available in open-­access network repositories, such as the Web of Life (www.web-of-life.es), are visitation networks (e.g. 16 of 18 in Schleuning et al, 2014), which include both pulp-­ pecking and seed predation interactions (see Figure 1). This may not be a problem for questions related to the trophic specialization of frugivores (Dalsgaard et al, 2017). A complete assessment of seed dispersal effectiveness requires consideration of post-­removal processes, from seed deposition to seedling establishment (Schupp, Jordano, & Gómez, 2017; Spiegel & Nathan, 2010; Wenny & Levey, 1998)

| MATERIALS AND METHODS
Findings
| DISCUSSION
| CONCLUSIONS
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call