Abstract
BackgroundCatch per unit effort is a cost-effective index of abundance and fishing effort, and an integral part of many fisheries stock assessments. Trap fisheries data are often generated using non-standardised methodology and the information to improve the accuracy of estimates is not always available due to current ecological knowledge gaps. Despite its economic importance, the European lobster Homarus gammarus has been relatively understudied compared to the closely related H. americanus. Previous studies investigating behaviour of Homarus spp. in relation to bait sources have been undertaken in aquariums or mesocosms rather than on free-ranging lobsters in the field. This study uses fine-scale acoustic telemetry data, and a null model approach to investigate free-ranging H. gammarus behaviour and movement in relation to baited commercial traps.ResultsThe distribution of lobsters {textit{n}} = 11 was largely similar in the presence and absence of traps. The time spent within 20 m of a trap ranged from 3 min to 16 h 55 min ({textit{n}} = 27), and the distance at which lobsters began approaching a trap varied considerably (5.40 m to 125 m, {textit{n}} = 22); the mean distances were larger than calculated by previous studies. A fifth of trap approaches resulted in movement against the current indicating a potential olfactory response to a bait plume. A pre-existing non-random association with a trap location may increase the time spent near the trap and reduce the minimum distance between the lobster and the trap.ConclusionsThis is the first study to assess the movement patterns of free-ranging H. gammarus in relation to a bait source. The larger approach distances in this study were likely due to the unrestricted ranging behaviour of the tagged lobsters. Aquarium and mesocosm studies provide greater experimental control, but may restrict movement and underestimate the area of bait influence. The use of null models to infer movement patterns of free-ranging lobsters has many advantages over aquarium-based studies. These include better highlighting of individual variability in behaviour, and the potential to elucidate the effects of bait plumes on catchability. Wider application of this approach can be used to improve estimates of catch and stock assessments.
Highlights
Catch per unit effort is a cost-effective index of abundance and fishing effort, and an integral part of many fisheries stock assessments
Catch per unit effort (CPUE) is widely used within fisheries management as a measure of both catch and effort, information that is necessary for fitting many fisheries stock assessment models [1]
Knowledge gaps still exist regarding the ecology, behaviour, and movement patterns of many commercially important species, and the likelihood of capture is commonly assumed to be equal across all demographics
Summary
Catch per unit effort is a cost-effective index of abundance and fishing effort, and an integral part of many fisheries stock assessments. This study uses fine-scale acoustic telemetry data, and a null model approach to investigate free-ranging H. gammarus behaviour and movement in relation to baited commercial traps. The motivation of individuals to respond to potential food sources can be affected by internal physiological states relating to moult and the associated predation risk [23], reproduction, and hunger regulation [10, 24]. It is the interplay between these factors that vary at both the individual and population level, and across multiple spatial scales, that make calculating the effective trapping area difficult [6, 25]
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.