Abstract

Videos of pigs were analysed using an optical flow algorithm to measure group movement in the four days leading up to and including an outbreak of tail-biting. 8 pens in which tail-biting occurred (Outbreak) were retrospectively matched with 8 similar pens in which no tail-biting occurred over the lifetime of the pigs (NoOutbreak) and videos analysed for the same four days. Results showed an increase in movement over the four days in both groups and no difference between Outbreak pens and their matched NoOutbreak pens. On the contrary, Outbreak and NoOutbreak matched pens showed similar changes in behaviour, suggesting that the pigs were influencing each other or responding to common external circumstances. Such a tendency to “match” the behaviour of pigs in neighbouring pens makes it difficult to identify which pens will show tail biting.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.