Abstract

Animals may respond to habitat quality and habitat edges and these responses may affect their distribution between habitats. We studied the movement behaviour of a ground-dwelling generalist predator, the carabid beetle Pterostichus melanarius (Illiger). We performed a mark-recapture experiment in two adjacent habitats; a large plot with oilseed radish (Raphanus sativus) and a plot with rye (Secale cereale). We used model selection to identify a minimal model representing the mark-recapture data, and determine whether habitat-specific motility and boundary behaviour affected population redistribution. We determined movement characteristics of P. melanarius in laboratory arenas with the same plant species using video recording. Both the field and arena results showed preference behaviour of P. melanarius at the habitat interface. In the field, significantly more beetles moved from rye to oilseed radish than from radish to rye. In the arena, habitat entry was more frequent into oilseed radish than into rye. In the field, movement was best described by a Fokker-Planck diffusion model that contained preference behaviour at the interface and did not account for habitat specific motility. Likewise, motility calculated from movement data using the Patlak model was not different between habitats in the arena studies. Motility (m2 d−1) calculated from behavioural data resulted in estimates that were similar to those determined in the field. Thus individual behaviour explained population redistribution in the field qualitatively as well as quantitatively. The findings provide a basis for evaluating movement within and across habitats in complex agricultural landscapes with multiple habitats and habitat interfaces.

Highlights

  • Conservation biological control requires the presence of natural enemies at the right time and place

  • We studied the movement behaviour of a ground-dwelling generalist predator, the carabid beetle Pterostichus melanarius (Illiger)

  • Of the beetles released in oilseed radish, 7% were recaptured in rye, and of those released in rye, 12% were recaptured in oilseed radish, indicating greater numbers moving from rye to oilseed radish than vice versa

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Conservation biological control requires the presence of natural enemies at the right time and place. One framework to study natural enemy movement is that of spillover [1]. One aspect that needs to be elucidated within this framework is the difference in species’ edge responses, especially which types of edges maximise spillover and how habitat size, configuration, quality and edge effects are related ([2] and references therein). While the ecological responses to habitat edges are well documented [3, 4] detailed discussion on edge behaviour is only emerging [5]. This discussion will benefit from detailed studies on movement behaviour in combination with a study on the population outcome of this behaviour

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call