Abstract
Laboratory studies of social behavior have typically focused on dyadic interactions occurring within a limited spatiotemporal context. However, this strategy prevents analyses of the dynamics of group social behavior and constrains identification of the biological pathways mediating individual differences in behavior. In the current study, we aimed to identify the spatiotemporal dynamics and hierarchical organization of a large social network of male mice. We also sought to determine if standard assays of social and exploratory behavior are predictive of social behavior in this social network and whether individual network position was associated with the mRNA expression of two plasticity-related genes, DNA methyltransferase 1 and 3a. Mice were observed to form a hierarchically organized social network and self-organized into two separate social network communities. Members of both communities exhibited distinct patterns of socio-spatial organization within the vivaria that was not limited to only agonistic interactions. We further established that exploratory and social behaviors in standard behavioral assays conducted prior to placing the mice into the large group was predictive of initial network position and behavior but were not associated with final social network position. Finally, we determined that social network position is associated with variation in mRNA levels of two neural plasticity genes, DNMT1 and DNMT3a, in the hippocampus but not the mPOA. This work demonstrates the importance of understanding the role of social context and complex social dynamics in determining the relationship between individual differences in social behavior and brain gene expression.
Highlights
Laboratory studies of mouse social behavior typically involve observations of dyadic interactions of non-familiar social partners in a novel environment (Brodkin, 2007; Kas et al, 2014)
Using statistical modeling and social network analysis, we aimed to identify more complex spatiotemporal patterns of social interactions between individuals, whether individuals would preferentially associate into sub-communities within the larger network
Degree assortativity and outdegree assortativity were significantly positive indicating that individuals were more likely to be connected to other individuals of similar out- and in-degrees, indicating that there exists a coreperiphery structure to the social network (Noldus and Mieghem, 2015)
Summary
Laboratory studies of mouse social behavior typically involve observations of dyadic interactions of non-familiar social partners in a novel environment (Brodkin, 2007; Kas et al, 2014). One of the most well-understood types of social organization is the dominance hierarchy, which has been studied in many different species, including insects (Röseler et al, 1984), fish (Maruska and Fernald, 2011), primates (Enger et al, 1954; Machado and Bachevalier, 2006; Noonan et al, 2014), and humans (Kumaran et al, 2012) These hierarchies may be determined through competitive dominance where animals out-compete each other for access to resources or agonistic dominance where animals are judged to be dominant based upon wins and losses against each other during agonistic contests (De Waal, 1989). We have previously shown that groups of twelve male mice living together in an ethologically relevant visible burrow system form stable linear dominance hierarchies based upon their expressions of agonistic and formal dominance (So et al, 2015; Williamson et al, 2016)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.